It is well known that the CFT at the critical point of the 1+1d transverse field Ising model has central charge 1/2. This can be attributed to the fact that, after a Jordan-Wigner transformation, the critical point consists of a Majorana mode which goes gapless.
On the other hand, the quantum XY model can also be solved by the Jordan-Wigner transformation and becomes a theory of free complex fermions hopping on the lattice. The CFT for this model is equivalent to a free boson (for example, this can be seen via bosonization. Another version consists of taking the classical 2d XY model and taking its continuum limit, which becomes a Gaussian scalar field). It then makes sense that the CFT describing this model has $c = 1$.
My question is the following: how do I see the difference in central charge from the lattice fermion theories? After doing Jordan-Wigner on both models, they both consist of the same degrees of freedom: complex fermions on each lattice site. However, the above implies that in the Ising case, only one of the underlying Majorana species participates in the long-distance physics, whereas in the XY case, they both participate and add their central charges. This isn't obvious to me from the forms of the fermion Hamiltonians. For concreteness, these are the Jordan-Wigner duals of the models which I use. For Ising, I have $$ H_{Ising} = - J \sum_{j} i \beta_{j+1} \alpha_j - h \sum_{j} i \beta_j \alpha_j$$ and for XY I have $$ H_{XY} = - J \sum_{j} i \beta_{j+1} \alpha_j + i \beta_{j} \alpha_{j+1}$$ where $\alpha_j, \beta_j$ are a pair of Majorana fermions associated with site $j$.