Wick rotation is formally described by the transformation $$t \mapsto it.$$ In many place it is stated more rigorously as an analytic continuation into imaginary time. I understand why we do it but now how we do it. When someone says analytic continuation I think taking a function defined in some domain in $\mathbb{C}^n$ and re-centering its power series to extend it (if possible) beyond its original domain.
I do not see how the above process is being applied when we Wick rotate. In particular, what is the function we are extending using analytic continuation? How is it guaranteed this can always be done?
I have taken a look at these questions:
- Wick rotation in field theory - rigorous justification?
- Wick Rotation & Scalar Field Value & Mapping
- Wick rotation: still trouble in getting how it works
but they do not get into details on how the analytic continuation is actually done, how it matches the definition of analytic continuation I described, what justifies that this can always be done, or (in the context of quantum field theory) what justifies that we can always recover the Minkowski field from the Euclidean one.