1
$\begingroup$

For my undergraduate studies, I was faced with the problem of finding the equations of motion for a particle subject to a uniform electric field, in the relativistic case. I would like to follow the procedure presented in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262474836_Relativistic_charged_particle_in_a_uniform_electromagnetic_field .

With that in mind, WLOG I have taken my electric field $\vec{E} = (0, 0, E),\ E>0$, for which I get the following trajectory for my charged particle $\alpha(\tau)$, $\alpha:I\subset\mathbb{R}\rightarrow M$ ($M$ being Minkowski's Space Time and $I$ an open interval that contains 0),

$$ \begin{bmatrix} (U_0^0\sinh(\omega\tau)+U_0^3(\cosh(\omega\tau)-1))/\omega \\ U_0^1\tau \\ U_0^2\tau \\ (U_0^3\sinh(\omega\tau)+U_0^0(\cosh(\omega\tau)-1))/\omega \\ \end{bmatrix} $$

Where I have defined $\omega= \frac{qE}{m}$,($q$ and $m$ are the charge and the mass of the particle), $\tau_0 = 0$ and $U(\tau_0) = U(0) = (U_0^0, U_0^1,U_0^2,U_0^3)$. (Are my calculations correct?)

Suppose I want to write this result in terms of the coordinate time $x^0$, in which the electric field is measured to be constant. Is it as straightforward as acknowledging the fact that

$$ x^0 = x^0(\tau) = (U_0^0\sinh(\omega\tau)+U_0^3(\cosh(\omega\tau)-1))/\omega? $$

In that case, what assumptions could I make WLOG regarding the initial conditions $U(\tau_0)$ as to invert this last relationship to obtain $\tau(x^0)$ (similar to taking $\vec{E}$ parallel to the z axis), and thus be able to write the trajectory in terms of $x^0$?

If I was treating simply with a three-vector, I believe I could take the initial condition to be in the YZ plane, for instance, but $U$ being a four-vector I don't know what I can assume.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ You should probably enclose that $x^0=x^0(\tau)=\dots$ part with double dollar signs as it's too long for an inline formula. $\endgroup$
    – Triatticus
    Commented Dec 30, 2023 at 21:19
  • $\begingroup$ I think you can invert the last equation without making any assumptions. Have you tried? (Hints: Write the hyperbolic trig functions in terms of positive and negative exponentials. Then write the positive exponential as $u$ and the negative as $1/u$ to get a quadratic equation.) $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Dec 31, 2023 at 5:33
  • $\begingroup$ The result of this will be something ugly. The spacetime approach where $x$, $y$, $z$, and $t$ are on equal footing, all parameterized by $\tau$, gave a beautiful result. Take your pick. I don’t understand why you think the electric field field isn’t constant in the spacetime approach. To get those equations, you assumed that it was. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Dec 31, 2023 at 5:50

0