K.Pull asked: But then, acceleration has only three parameters, so how are they enough to make all the Christoffel symbols go to zero?
One needs to keep in mind that the Christophel symbols are defined in spacetime. As such, one needs to consider the acceleration also as something that has four components. The following might appear a lengthy response but it might be worth a read.
For 3D spatial motion, we have the trajectory as (where $X$ is a chart-map a.k.a. coordinate system)
$$X: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{3}$$
$$X: t \rightarrow \left(x^{1}(t), x^{2}(t), x^{3}(t)\right)$$
Now, for an accelerating particle, the equation of motion would be ($\alpha$ runs from (1,3))
$$m \ddot{X}^{\alpha}(t)=F^{\alpha}(X(t)) \implies \ddot{X}^{\alpha}(t)=f^{\alpha}(X(t)) \tag{1}$$
where in the second half, I only used the force per unit mass (so mass has been removed, so to speak).
As it turns out, Eq. (1) cannot be seen as an autoparallel (uniform, straight-line motion) in the 3D space. One needs to promote this to a 4D spacetime version. One can do that by making the following change
$$X: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{4}$$
$$X: t \rightarrow \left(t, x^{1}(t), x^{2}(t), x^{3}(t)\right)$$
This still results in the same equation of motion, i.e.,
$$ \ddot{X}^{\alpha}(t)=f^{\alpha}(X(t))$$
but now can be written in a different form, namely
$$ \ddot{X}^{\alpha}(t)-f^{\alpha}(X(t)) \dot{X}^{0}(t) \dot{X}^{0}(t)=0 \tag{2}$$
where $\dot{X}^{0}(t) = 1$.
The equation in spacetime can now be written as
$$\ddot{X}^{a}+\Gamma_{b c}^{a} \dot{X}^{b} \dot{X}^{c}=0$$
but note that due to Eq. (2), only $\Gamma_{00}^{a} = f^{\alpha}(X(t)) \neq 0$.
This is the geodesic equation where only $\Gamma_{00}^{a} \neq 0$. Now if you choose a frame of reference where even $f^{\alpha}(X(t)) = 0$ (so there is no force), then you can see that even $\Gamma_{00}^{a} = 0$ implying that $\Gamma_{bc}^{a} = 0$.
For more, see this nice lecture.