1
$\begingroup$

This is the same problem as someone asked before: Problem understanding something from the variational principle for free particle motion (James Hartle's book, chapter 5)

The question below:

Here is the problem. First, we have $$L = \biggl[\biggl(\frac{dt}{d\sigma}\biggr)^2 - \biggl(\frac{dx}{d\sigma}\biggr)^2 - \biggl(\frac{dy}{d\sigma}\biggr)^2 - \biggl(\frac{dz}{d\sigma}\biggr)^2\biggr]^\frac{1}{2} \tag{5.57}$$ then, $$-\frac{d}{d\sigma}\biggl(\frac{\partial L}{\partial(dx^\alpha/d\sigma)}\biggr) + \frac{\partial L}{\partial x^\alpha} = 0 .\tag{5.58}$$ And considering that $x^1 = x$ we conclude that $$\frac{d}{d\sigma}\biggl[\frac{1}{L}\frac{dx^1}{d\sigma}\biggr] = 0. \tag{5.60}$$

I can't understand how eq (5.60) came. I don't know how he got this equation. I tried solving this, but I can't get the equation. Even a hint on how to proceed will be appreciated.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I hope the notation of writing $L = \sqrt{\eta_{\mu\nu}\dot{x}^{\mu}\dot{x}^{\nu}}$ is clear as this makes the following calculations very compact.

\begin{equation} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}^{\alpha}} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\eta_{\mu\nu}\dot{x}^{\mu}\dot{x}^{\nu}\right)^{-1/2}\times 2\dot{x}^{\alpha} = \frac{\dot{x}^{\alpha}}{L} \end{equation} The above is just a consequence of chain rule. To be explicit the Minkowski metric was introduced $\eta_{\mu\nu} = diag(1,-1,-1,-1)$ and $\dot{x}^{\alpha}= \frac{d x^{\alpha}}{d \sigma}$. Also $\frac{\partial L}{\partial x^{\alpha}} = 0$. The answer they proved follows.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Got it and also $\dot{x}^{\alpha}$ should be a total derivative, not partial, right? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 11, 2023 at 13:48
  • $\begingroup$ Yes as the coordinates are parametrised by one parameter - the affine parameter $\sigma$. Have edited my answer accordingly. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 11, 2023 at 14:00