A question on the IB HL Physics paper of a couple of years back looks like this:
In the second image, taken from this video solution, you see that the given answer should be D.
Now, I have an issue with this and would like to see where I'm going wrong, in case.
First, there's always the ambiguity (typical of these tests) about how is the current in the secondary defined, but I think the standard way is opposite to what's shown in this picture:
I'm taking this pic because it neatly summarises the constitutive relationships of an ideal tranasformer, which is the object of the question.
In the question, $n = \dfrac{N_2}{N_1} = 200/100 = 2$ so that while voltage is increasing in going from primary to secondary, current is halved.
Also, depending on your convention, the ratio between primary and secondary current could entail a 180 degrees phase rotation, or a sign inversion.
However, the answer considered correct is showing some sort of 90 degrees phase shift. The video reported above talks about the output current being proportional to the induced emf and therefore to the variation of primary current, however I find this explanation sketchy and more than anything else, the relationship between currents in an ideal transformer is:
$$i_2 = - \dfrac{1}{n} i_1$$
Nothing else. So there can be a sign inversion, as said, depending on the convention, but no extra phase shift.
Are the constitutive relationships I'm using somehow incorrect for the case at hand? If so, why?