3
$\begingroup$

According to GR, it is possible to redshift the frequency of a photon using a magnetic field as demonstrated by the Gerstenshtein Effect: https://web.archive.org/web/20210225134450/http://jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_038_04_0652.pdf

In layman's terms, what is the required magnetic field (in Teslas) to reduce X amount of Joules from a photon?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Link does not work. $\endgroup$
    – joseph h
    Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 2:03
  • $\begingroup$ Their parser added a space somehow. Fixed. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 2:16
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, I added that space myself. The first time I clicked the link it timed out due to a network misconfiguration on my side, and I thought it was how you typed the URL. It does indeed work. Sorry. $\endgroup$
    – joseph h
    Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 2:35

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Photons are elementary particles, and as such have to obey the algebra of special relativity and the mathematics of quantum mechanics. A single photon's mass is zero , and can only have an energy-momentum four vector and spin 1. In the observations and experiments it has been proven that a confluence of photons build up the classical electromagnetic wave, whose frequency is related to the photons energy by $E_(photon)= hν$ where $h$ is planck's constant.

The experimental and theoretical study of electrodynamics at the quantum level is well validated, and the calculations where photons are concerned are carried out with the Feynman diagrams for the reaction. So your:

what is the required magnetic field (in Teslas) to reduce X amount of Joules from a photon?

has the answer that a photon's energy can be changed only with interactions and the interaction with the magnetic field will be with a virtual exchange of a photon with complicated Feynman diagrams that would have to be calculated for the specific case of the specific magnetic field, no blanket number will come out.

Gravitational change of frequency is a different case. The theory of General Relativity has to be invoked and as it is not yet definitively quantized a nomenclature is being used that mixes up classical electromagnetic wave language with observations of electromagnetic waves in strong gravitational fields. At the quantum level, it is not the "same" photon that arrives changed in our earth observations. If it has a different energy than it started with, it must have interacted, and by definition of photon ( its energy is the main identity) it is a new photon. If gravity becomes quantized, the original photon must have interacted with the gravitational field with an exchange of a graviton. Otherwise one should keep talking of classical electromagnetic waves and their interactions.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Why not just assume that the emission of photons in a heavier/weaker gravitational potential leads to a red/blue shift? Then the photon always remains the same. A possible and much simpler explanation. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 17, 2022 at 19:38

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.