0
$\begingroup$

I was solving an exercise the other day, about a rolling cylinder on an inclined plane. Initially the cylinder slides, but then it begins to roll and the problem wanted to know the velocity of the Center of Mass at the instant in which the rolling motion begun. I instinctively applied $I_c \underline{\omega} = \underline{M_c}$ (all the moments expressed with respect to the Center of Mass) and solved the problem correctly according to the solution. However, after having given it some thought I realized that what I did was wrong: in fact, you can only apply such equation with respect to a point of instantaneous rotation (that is, a point instantaneously in quiet) or, in extreme cases, with respect to the Center of Mass when the istantaneous point of rotation exists and is at a fixed distance from the center and moving with it (which is not my case, since the point of istantaneous rotation moved from its initial position to the point of contact with the plane).

I would really like to know if I am right or wrong and why.

As always, any comment or answer is highly appreciated!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Is $M_c$ here the angular momentum w.r.t the COM ? $\endgroup$
    – Ben
    Commented Jun 20, 2022 at 15:31

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

The expression $ \underline{M}_c = \mathrm{I}_c \,\underline{\omega}$ is never correct. I think you forgot the time derivative of rotational velocity here. Also, the are Coriolis torques that relate to the rotation of the rigid body

$$ \underline{M}_c = \mathrm{I}_c \,\underline{\dot{\omega}} + \underline{\omega} \times \mathrm{I}_c \underline{\omega} \tag{1}$$

This relates the net moment on the body $\underline{M}_c$ to the angular acceleration of the body $\underline{\dot{\omega}}$ and it similar to Newton's 2nd law $\underline{F} = m\, \underline{\dot{v}}_c$. Both together form the Newton-Euler equations of motion for the rigid body.

This is derived from the differentiation of

$$ \underline{M}_c = \tfrac{\rm d}{{\rm d}t} \underline{L}_c = \tfrac{\rm d}{{\rm d}t} \left( \mathrm{I}_c \underline{\omega} \right) = \mathrm{I}_c \tfrac{\rm d}{{\rm d}t} \left( \underline{\omega} \right) + \tfrac{\rm d}{{\rm d}t} \left( \mathrm{I}_c \right) \underline{\omega} $$

Care must be taken to sum the moments about the center of mass, evaluate the mass moment of inertia tensor about the center of mass, and express all quantities on the same basis vectors (same orientation).

The only simplification for (1) is when the rotation $\underline{\omega}$ coincides with a principal axis of rotation. Then the second term is dropped, as is the case for the 2D planar projection of (1).

When considering an arbitrary point b not at the center of mass, then rotational equations of motion become slightly more complex

$$ \underline{M}_{b} = {\rm I}_{b}\,\underline{\dot{\omega}}+\underline{\omega}\times{\rm I}_{b}\,\underline{\omega}+\underline{c}\times m\,\underline{\dot{v}}_{b} \tag{2}$$

where $\underline{c}$ is the position of the center of mass relative to b and $\mathrm{I}_b$ is the mass moment of inertia summed at b and $\underline{\dot{v}}_{b}$ is the acceleration of point b.

The above is an advantage if the acceleration of b is known, like in the case of a pin joint. In that case Newton's second law can be simplified because the acceleration of the center of mass is no longer needed

$$ \underline{F} =m\left(\underline{\dot{v}}_{b}-\underline{c}\times\underline{\dot{\omega}}+\underline{\omega}\times\left(\underline{\omega}\times\underline{c}\right)\right) \tag{3}$$

$\endgroup$
13
  • $\begingroup$ Please define c. $\endgroup$
    – John Darby
    Commented Jun 21, 2022 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnDarby - Sorry, I had and deleted it. I added it back. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2022 at 23:31
  • $\begingroup$ These relationships are for the body frame (non-inertial frame) fixed in the moving body, not relationships in the fixed (inertial) space frame. $\endgroup$
    – John Darby
    Commented Jun 22, 2022 at 13:36
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnDarby - why did you think so? They are not. In the body frame $\underline{\omega} = 0$ and similarly for other local quantities. Even though b might be riding on the body, from an inertial point of view it has $\underline{\dot{v}}_b \neq 0$ whereas if it was for an body riding frame the point would be fixed and $\underline{\dot{v}}_b = 0$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22, 2022 at 16:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think I understand from your referenced earlier answer. Also, your answer to physics.stackexchange.com/questions/104513/… helped. So Ic is in the inertial (space axes) frame, not in the non-inertial (body axis) frame, correct? $\endgroup$
    – John Darby
    Commented Jun 23, 2022 at 3:59
0
$\begingroup$

Cylinder rolling in the inclined plane.

enter image description here

starting with the free body diagram , you obtain two equations

translation $$m\,\ddot s=-F\tag 1$$ rotation $$I_{\text{CM}}\,\ddot\varphi=F\,r+\tau\tag 2$$

now , if the cylinder slide on the inclined plane , the contact force F is equal zero, if the cylinder rolled on the inclined plane ,from the rolling condition you obtain additional equation

$$s=r\,\varphi\quad\Rightarrow\quad \ddot s=r\,\ddot\varphi\tag 3$$

with those three equations you obtain the solution

$$\ddot\varphi=\frac{\tau}{I_{\text{CM}}+m\,r^2}$$ you can obtain this solution if you take the sum of the torques about the contact point A, (where $~m\,\ddot s=0~$, becuse the instantaneous rotation).

$$I_A\,\ddot\varphi=\tau$$

where

$$I_A=I_{\text{CM}}+m\,r^2$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Only if the plane is a frictionless surface will the body slip with no rotation. With friction. the body rolls and slips. The greater the force of friction the greater the rolling, and if the force of friction is sufficient there is pure rolling and no slipping. $\endgroup$
    – John Darby
    Commented Jun 22, 2022 at 13:41