I have seen two definitions of chirality in quantum field theory:
- According to the Wikipedia article, chirality is defined as whether a particle transforms under a left- or right-handed representation of the Poincare group. Chiral states are eigenstates of the chirality operator $\gamma^5$ with eigenvalues $\pm 1$.
- In Eq. (4.28) of these notes, chirality of a Hamiltonian $H(\mathbf{k}) = v_i(\mathbf{k}) \sigma^i + \epsilon(k)\mathbf{1} $ is given by $$ \chi=\mathrm{sgn}\ \mathrm{det}(v_{ij}(\mathbf{k}_\alpha)), \quad v_{ij}=\frac{\partial v_i}{\partial k^j}$$ where $\mathbf{k}_\alpha$ are the points at which $v_i(\mathbf{k}_\alpha) = 0$ for all $i$.
At first glance, these two definitons seem completely different. The first definition is concerned with representations of the Poincare group where chirality is a property of states, whilst the second definition defines chirality as a property of the Hamiltonian and not the states.
These two definitions must be related somehow as the latter is used when discussing quantising a fermion on a lattice (the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem), however I cannot see how these are related. If these two definitions are indeed equivalent, how does one show it?