OK, since you expressly asked for an illustration for su(2), as free of the specialized math notation of WP, consider
$$
[T_j,T_k]= i \epsilon_{jkm} T_m.
$$
The three $T$s are abstract vectors in the Lie algebra, which you may represent by square matrices of arbitrary size, such as the 2×2 Pauli matrices, $\pi_2(T_j)= \sigma_j/2$.
The crucial point is that the structure constants don't really care about the specific rep. All reps satisfy the above Lie algebra—but not arbitrary relations among functions of them (like their squares!).
Thus, the linear map
$$
\operatorname{ad}_{T_j} ~ T_k \equiv [T_j,T_k]=i\epsilon_{jkm} T_m
$$
scrambles the three $T_k$s by multiplication through the 3×3 matrix $i\epsilon^j_{km}$.
We see below that the three linear maps $\operatorname{ad}_{T_j}$ provide a 3-dim representation of the group, regardless of what rep one would use for illustrating the Ts—which is needless! Specifically,
$$
[\operatorname{ad}_{T_j}, \operatorname{ad}_{T_n}] ~ T_k= (\operatorname{ad}_{T_j}\operatorname{ad}_{T_n}-\operatorname{ad}_{T_n}\operatorname{ad}_{T_j}) ~T_k\\
= [T_j,[T_n,T_k]]-[T_n,[T_j,T_k]]=[[T_j,T_n],T_k]\\
\large = \operatorname{ad}_{(i\epsilon_{jnm}T_m)} ~ T_k,
$$
the middle line by virtue of the Jacobi identity. That is, by virtue of linearity,
$$
[\operatorname{ad}_{T_j}, \operatorname{ad}_{T_n}]= i\epsilon_{jnk} \operatorname{ad}_{T_k},
$$
so $\operatorname{ad}_{T_j}\mapsto \pi_3(T_j)$. Its dimension is 3, the number of generators of su(2), the dimension of the vector space that ad acts on.
Again, if you used $\pi_2(T_j)$, or $\pi_{137}(T_j)$, for the $T_j$s, you wouldn't have specified this $\pi_3(T_j)$ any differently. It's absolute, in your terminology.
To look at the group action, you exponentiate,
$$
e^{it\operatorname{ad}_{T_j}} ~ T_k= e^ { itT_j }~T_k ~ e^{ -itT_j }\equiv \operatorname{Ad}_{\exp(itT_j )} ~ T_k ~~ \leadsto \\
\operatorname{Ad}_{\exp(itT_j )} ~ e^{iT_k} = e^{itT_j }~e^{iT_k} ~ e^{-itT_j },
$$
as a similarity transformation, where no summation over indices, repeated or exponentiated, is implied. This is the group automorphism of WP.
The first equality is often dubbed the Hadamard lemma; the end result may be seen to only involve nested commutators: $Y+\left[X,Y\right]+\frac{1}{2!}[X,[X,Y]]+\frac{1}{3!}[X,[X,[X,Y]]]+\cdots= e^{X}Y e^{-X}$ .
Calling the group elements, unitary operators, $U= e^{iT_k} $ and $V= e^ { itT_j }$, you see that the group "multiplication table" (infinite!) of any and all different Us is identical, by similarity, to that of the $V U V^{-1}$s; as before, nothing depends on the representation: it will be the same table.
For the doublet representation, 2×2 unitary matrices, the adjoint group automorphism
$$
V\mapsto V U V^ \dagger
$$
is the cornerstone of chiral dynamics. But again, you may see that, since only commutators are involved in your operations, the same combinatoric answers would obtain for all reps.
(This is the celebrated Lie's third theorem: the combined exponent in the CBH composition formula combining group elements is strictly in the Lie algebra, so the combinatorics of the nested commutators involved is identical for all reps. You might as well stick to abstract Lie algebra elements).