1
$\begingroup$

I'm reading electrodynamics physics notes that describe the polarization of a medium. The notes describe the active atoms as having two levels $a$ and $b$, separated by energy $\hbar \omega$ and represented by a density matrix $\rho$. The atoms are stationary.

The equation of motion of the density matrix is

$$\dot{\rho} = -i[H, \rho] - \dfrac{1}{2}\left(\Gamma \rho + \rho \Gamma \right) + \lambda,$$

where

$$\rho = \begin{bmatrix} \rho_{aa} & \rho_{ab} \\ \rho_{ba} & \rho_{bb} \end{bmatrix}, \ \ \ \ \ H = \begin{bmatrix} W_{a} & V \\ V & W_{b} \end{bmatrix}, \\ \Gamma = \begin{bmatrix} \gamma_{a} & 0 \\ 0 & \gamma_{b} \end{bmatrix}, \ \ \ \ \ \lambda = \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_{a} & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_{b} \end{bmatrix}$$

The notes then state that the perturbation Hamiltonian is $\hbar V$, and the unperturbed energies of the levels are $\hbar W_a$ and $\hbar W_b$. Furthermore, the two levels decay with damping constants $\gamma_a$ and $\gamma_b$, and are populated by pumping at rates $\lambda_a$ and $\lambda_b$.

Therefore, using the Fourier expansion of the electric field $E(z, t) = \sum\limits_n A_n(t) u_n(z)$, where $u_n(z) = \sin(k_n z)$ and $k_n = \dfrac{n \pi}{L}$, the notes claim that the electric dipole approximation for the perturbation becomes

enter image description here

I've included the image of the equation because I don't actually understand what that symbol between $A(t)$ and $u(z)$ is (I can't find it as a LaTeX symbol, and I've never seen it before). What is this symbol and how was it part of this derivation?


Relevant: Quantum Mechanical Electric Dipole Hamiltonian

$$V(t) = - \left( \sum_j \dfrac{q_j}{m_j} \left( \hat{\epsilon} \cdot \hat{p}_j \right) \right) \dfrac{E_0}{\omega} \sin(\omega t) \tag{7.3.13}$$

$\endgroup$
17
  • $\begingroup$ It looks like the symbol for the Weierstrass p-function, but I have no idea what it means in this context. In LaTeX it's \wp, which gives $\wp$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 11, 2022 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelSeifert Ahh, thanks for that. My best guess is that it's a catch-all constant for a bunch of other constants that come along in the derivation, but I'm not sure. If it is a catch-all constant, then it's a bit weird that it's written as sitting between the $A(t)$ and $u(z)$, rather than out front. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 11, 2022 at 20:00
  • $\begingroup$ There is no such symbol that I can see in the linked page… $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 11, 2022 at 22:44
  • $\begingroup$ @ZeroTheHero The one I linked? That's not the source – it's just some material that covers the theory of electric dipole Hamiltonians. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 11, 2022 at 22:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't know how to say this without sounding rude, but I feel like recently you've been asking a lot of questions because you've been spending time reading particularly unclear, unpolished sets of lecture notes. I spent a lot of time doing just that in college, because I simply read whatever the professors gave me, but in reality everything is covered much better in standard books... $\endgroup$
    – knzhou
    Commented Jan 21, 2022 at 4:36

2 Answers 2

2
+50
$\begingroup$

Energy of a dipole $p$ is minus $p$ times electric field (https://unlcms.unl.edu/cas/physics/tsymbal/teaching/EM-913/section4-Electrostatics.pdf), so your symbol probably denotes the electric dipole moment (which is closely related to polarization, as @ZeroTheHero suggested).

EDIT (Jan 20, 2022) Looks like the derivation of the energy of an electric dipole in the electric field is given in Journal of Modern Optics (2004) vol. 51, no. 8, 1137–114, Section 2, so the symbol is indeed the electric dipole moment.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I looked through the document, but I don't see anything that resembles $V(t) = - A(t) \wp \sin(k_n z) / \hbar$. Which part of section 2 is this? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2022 at 14:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ThePointer: They derive the interaction Hamiltonian in the form $-d\cdot E$ and they pretty much get it in (2.10). Note that in your case $E=A(t)u(z)$, and $V(t)$ is the interaction Hamiltonian (up to a constant). $\endgroup$
    – akhmeteli
    Commented Jan 21, 2022 at 15:14
  • $\begingroup$ So their $e$ is basically my $\wp$? And I'm assuming $e$ contains the $\dfrac{1}{\hbar}$ factor in mine? What is the $\dfrac{\pi^2}{2m}$ in theirs? This term seems to be absent in mine. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2022 at 16:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, your ℘ is their $e r$. And their $\pi^2/2m$ is not relevant, it's kinetic energy. As for $\hbar$, your interaction Hamiltonian is $\hbar V$. $\endgroup$
    – akhmeteli
    Commented Jan 21, 2022 at 16:46
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I understand. Thanks for taking the time to clarify. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2022 at 20:51
1
$\begingroup$

Forming my comments into an answer.

The odd symbol you're looking at is most certainly the (negative of the) electric dipole moment of an individual atom, or the electric dipole moment density of the uniform gas. I've never seen that symbol used before, so it's quite odd the author didn't clearly state what this symbol meant.

You're wondering how to derive the electric dipole approximation, which is essentially the equation in that picture, from the equations up above (the evolution equation for the density matrix, and the electric field Fourier decomposition). However, the dipole approximation is a separately derived approximation, and by itself has nothing to do with those equations. The author of those lecture notes is presumably using the dipole approximation as a tool to write a simplified evolution equation for $\rho$.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.