0
$\begingroup$

In Bohmian mechanics does a pilot wave have a mass and what is the mass?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Some comments removed. To answer the question, please post an answer. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Nov 1, 2021 at 22:29
  • $\begingroup$ You deleted a comment from @bill explaining that he's a layperson and needs a non-technical answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2021 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ Well, one comment Was a nontechnical answer, in hope that the OP would refine his question: pilot waves have no more or less mass than Schroedinger wavefunctions do, hence they don't. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 7, 2021 at 22:16

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Pilot waves have no more and no less mass than Schroedinger wavefuction waves do, since their mathematics is identical.

To bypass ghastly ontological quandaries, recall that the math of the waves cares not about what the particles they guide ("pilot") do or don't. The math of the waves is just the math of the Schroedinger equation in polar (Madelung) language.

So, for a free particle, of mass m, you have $$\psi = R \; \exp \left( \frac{i \, S}{\hbar} \right), ~~~~~ R^2 = |\psi|^2, ~~~ \leadsto $$
$$ \frac{\, \partial R^2 \,}{\, \partial t \,} + \nabla \cdot \left( R^2 \vec{v} \right) = 0 ~ , \tag {1} $$ where the particle velocity field is determined by the “guidance equation”, $\vec{v}\left(\,\vec{r},\,t\,\right) = \frac{1}{\,m\,} \, \nabla S\left(\, \vec{r},\, t \,\right) $, and also a further equation, a modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation,
$$- \frac{\partial S}{\partial t} = \frac{\;\left|\, \nabla S \,\right|^2\,}{\,2m\,} + Q ~ ,\tag {2} $$ where Q is the quantum potential, an additional piece lacking in the classical equation,
$$ Q = - \frac{\hbar^2}{\,2m\,} \frac{\nabla^2 R }{ R } ~, $$ responsible for all the "mysterious" effects of quantum mechanics.

The above guidance equation then amounts to
$$ m \, \frac{d}{dt} \, \vec{v} = - \nabla Q ~ , ~~~~\hbox{where} ~~~\frac{d}{dt} \equiv \frac{ \partial }{\, \partial t \,} + \vec{v} \cdot \nabla ~ . $$

But notice that, interpretations aside, except for the fact we used the velocity field as a mere shorthand for the gradient of S in (1), the probability continuity equation, the two PDEs (1), (2), don't know or care about the particle: they are really a transcription of the two components (real and imaginary) of Schroedinger's equation describing probability amplitude waves.

  • As such, the waves they describe obviously don't have a mass, unless you bought the destructive interpretational blather about the particle being the same as its probability wave. They just dictate how a particle moves as they pilot it.

They are also dispersive, i.e., they have a group velocity different than the phase velocity, but this is not thought of as a mass.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.