0
$\begingroup$

The Hamiltonian of quantum chromodynamics (like the rest of the Standard Model) is rotationally symmetric. My question is whether these space symmetries are spontaneously broken in the ground state of hadrons.

The cartoon version of a hadron looks like this: https://profmattstrassler.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/nucleons2.png

A more realistic (although still simplified) picture looks like this, showing the presence of a huge number of "sea" quarks and antiquarks: enter image description here

(Image sources: https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/particle-physics-basics/the-structure-of-matter/protons-and-neutrons/)

Q1: Do the ground-state wavefunctions of hadrons preserve or spontaneously break rotational symmetry? (I'm talking about rotations in physical space; of course a hadron is a singlet with respect to "rotations" in SU(3) color space). For a given proton, do the positions of the quarks pick out a special spatial orientation?

For scalar mesons, my guess is that the ground state is unique and the quarks are perfectly rotationally symmetric. But for baryons and vector mesons, the presence of nonzero spin degeneracy makes me wonder whether there's some kind of spin-orbit coupling that connects the hadron's spin angular momentum and the positions of the constituent quarks.

Q2: I know that the position of a particle is a subtle concept in relativistic QFT. But is it possible to come up with some kind of effective position density function $\rho({\bf x}) := \langle 0 | \hat{N}({\bf x}) | 0 \rangle$ within a hadron, where $\hat{N}({\bf x})$ represents a local quark number operator? (Side Q3: is it possible to separately do this for the "primary" quarks and for the antiquarks, or only for the total quark number operator that represents their difference?) If so, what does this position density function look like? Is it rotationally symmetric (this is a special case of Q1)? If so, does the probability density fall off monotonically with distance from the center of the hadron, or does the most likely location lie at a finite distance from the center? (Note that the most likely location is different from the most likely distance from the center, because the latter gets multiplied by a factor of $r^2$ from the Jacobian factor in the change of variables.)

Again, my guess is that for a scalar meson, $\rho({\bf x})$ is rotationally symmetric and monotonically decreases with distance, but I'm not as sure about the hadrons with spin.

$\endgroup$
11
  • $\begingroup$ I'll comment instead of answering, since I don't actually know anything about QCD. But my strong suspicion is that there is no spontaneous symmetry breaking. In general, SSB only makes sense in the thermodynamic limit, ie in an infinitely large system; in a finite system, there can be tunneling between spontaneously broken ground states, and there will generically be a unique ground state. SSB is still a useful picture in large but finite systems (ex: superfluidity in condensed matter), but given that these are $\mathcal{O}(100)$ size systems, I strongly suspect that SSB cannot occur. $\endgroup$
    – Zack
    Commented Jun 26, 2021 at 22:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Zack I agree with you that SSB can only take place in the thermodynamic limit, but I don't think that the number of nucleons is the right way to quantify your "system size". I believe that the right value is the number of lattice sites in your lattice QCD simulation, which is implicitly taken to infinity if the continuum limit of QFT, so that (for these purposes) QFT always plays out on the thermodynamic limit no matter how many particles you have. $\endgroup$
    – tparker
    Commented Jun 26, 2021 at 23:52
  • $\begingroup$ You might help the reader understand what you are asking if you compared your bound states to orthopositronium (so QCD is out of the picture) or the excited χ mesons. A proton has spin 1/2, so it is not a singlet, if that were what you were asking, which it obviously isn't. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 27, 2021 at 13:31
  • $\begingroup$ @tparker Please correct me if you think I'm mistaken, but I don't think SSB occurs in the continuum limit without the thermodynamic limit (ie, $N \rightarrow \infty$ while the lattice spacing $a \rightarrow 0$ such that $V$ is constant) either. Once again, superfluidity is a good example: Mudry's textbook, for instance, has a very nice discussion on SSB in superfluidity in a finite volume of space (with continuous spacetime). $\endgroup$
    – Zack
    Commented Jun 27, 2021 at 14:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possibly useful. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 28, 2021 at 12:54

0