In Goldstein's Classical mechanics question 2.22
Suppose a particle moves in space subject to a conservative potential $V(\textbf{r})$ but is constrained to always move on a surface whose equation is $\sigma(\textbf{r},t)=0$. (The explicit dependence on $t$ indicates the surface is moving.) The instantaneous force of constraint is taken as always perpendicular to the surface. Show analytically that the energy of the particle is not conserved if the surface moves in time. What physically is the reason for non-conservation of the energy under this circumstance?
So the way I see it we can use the surface equation as the constraint, hence the generalised force is given by $\sum_{i}\lambda\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial q_i}$ with $\lambda$ being a lagrange multiplier.
The energy is given by $E=T+V$, and the energy is conservative if $\frac{dE}{dt}=0$. From the question we know $\frac{dV}{dt}=0$. so we have to show that $\frac{dT}{dt} \ne 0$.
Now since the surface changes over time I imagined the kinetic energy would look something like this
$$T=\frac{1}{2}m(v^2+\dot{\sigma}^2)$$
Where $v$ is the particle velocity and $\dot \sigma=\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial t}$ is the surface velocity. However this doesn't explicitly depend on time (t) . so $\frac{dE}{dt}=0$.
I then thought to decompose $v$ as a function of the surface tangent vectors i.e. $ v = \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial \textbf{r}}\frac{\partial \textbf{r}}{\partial t}$. So that the kinetic energy becomes
$$T=\frac{1}{2}m(\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial \textbf{r}}\cdot \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial \textbf{r}}\dot{\textbf{r}}^2 + \dot{\sigma}^2) $$
However, again I dont see any explicit dependence on time (t) . Unless it is assumed that $\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial \textbf{r}}$ is explicitly dependent on t? I am not sure where I am going wrong.