2
$\begingroup$

When deriving the strain (either dimensionless or its polarization components...), it is standard to assume the background metric is the (flat) Minkowski metric, i.e.

$$ g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon h_{\mu\nu}.$$

Question: what happens when we assume a different background, for example, the Schwarzschild metric? Or something else? Would the wave equation still be recovered? I imagine it can become complicated quickly. Is there work in the classical General Relativity literature exploring this possibility? Or is there some physical reason why doing this is nonsensical (or possibly undesirable)?

EDIT: I understand that metric perturbations are used in cosmology, but I am specifically wondering about studying gravitational radiation.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I presume that the very precise calculations of radiation from colliding black holes do not assume a Minkowski background $\endgroup$
    – jwimberley
    Commented Jan 22, 2021 at 14:31

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

You can linearize general relativity on any background. With an appropriate choice of gauge the resulting of equations of motion for the perturbation closely resemble a wave equation on a curved background.

This is explored in great depth in the literature. The most prominent spacetimes to expand around are:

  1. FLRW cosmological spacetimes. to study gravitational waves in cosmology.
  2. Black hole space times.

The first is important in cosmology. I will not say much about this as it is not my area of expertise.

In the second case it turns out solving directly for the metric perturbation is often not the most convenient thing. Instead one often solves for the perturbations of the Weyl scalars instead. It turns out that in the case of a black hole background, the equations of motion for the (perturbed) Weyl scalar $\psi_4$ completely decouples from the other components of the curvature tensor. Moreover, it turns out that the metric perturbation can be recovered completely once you know $\psi_4$. Top things off, $\psi_4$ is gauge invariant. One can thus solve a single (complex) PDE, instead of a set of coupled PDEs for a rank-2 tensor field.

The equation of motion for $\psi_4$ is known as the Teukolsky equation, and is closely related to the equation of motion for a massless scalar field.

The Teukolsky equation (and black hole perturbation theory in general) is used for studying gravitational waves in two main ways:

  1. Linear perturbation theory can be used to study how a perturbed black hole (e.g. just after a merger) settles down to a stationary state. The modes of the linear field during ringdown are known as quasinormal modes. Here is a topical review regarding their calculation by Berti, Cardoso, and Starinets: 0905.2975

  2. Black hole perturbation theory can also be used to study the evolution of a black hole binary under the emission of gravitational waves in the limit that one of the components of the binary is much heavier than the other. In this case the evolution of the binary and the resulting gravitational wave form can be systematically expanded in powers of the mass-ratio. This is known as "small mass-ratio" or "gravitational self-force" approach. Here is a recent review by Barack and Pound: 1805.10385.

    Despite this approach to modelling black hole binaries being primarily at small mass-ratio systems (such as extreme mass-ratio inspirals), it provides surprisingly accurate results even for equal mass binaries. (See 2006.12036)

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer! I think I see. So using the Kerr metric for background metric gives the Teukolsky equation, and the $\psi_4$ Weyl scalar carries gravitational wave information. Do you have any references for how this is used in gravitational wave modeling and/or data analysis? IF so, I'll happily accept your answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 23, 2021 at 12:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DaddyKropotkin, I have expanded the answer. $\endgroup$
    – TimRias
    Commented Jan 25, 2021 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for these great references! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 16, 2021 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ One question: you say With an appropriate choice of gauge the resulting of equations of motion for the perturbation closely resemble a wave equation on a curved background. Is this to say that some gauge choices are problematic for a given background? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 23, 2021 at 18:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DaddyKropotkin To get a wavelike equation for the metric perturbation itself you need to adopt the Lorenz/deDonder/harmonic (different names depending on context) gauge condition. There are other gauges that work (such as the Regge-Wheeler gauge). However, in general choosing a different will make solving the linearized field equation more difficult. $\endgroup$
    – TimRias
    Commented Feb 23, 2021 at 18:18

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.