0
$\begingroup$

Well Ricci's theorem is given by: $$\mathrm{D}g_{ij}=\mathrm{D}g^{ij}=0$$ I was wondering that if the theorem can be proved using covariant derivatives of $\delta_i^k$, $g_{ij}$ and $g^{ik}$.

I really need this proof.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What assumptions do you want to start from? $\endgroup$
    – knzhou
    Commented May 5, 2020 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ Voting to move to the Mathematics; while this theorem may be relevant in general relativity, it is not presented in a physics context whatsoever and thus can be answered as a purely differential geometry question. $\endgroup$
    – JamalS
    Commented May 5, 2020 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ @JamalS M professor said once that Physicists knew more about tensors than mathematicians, since there's a tag 'Tensor calculus' it's accepted to ask about it $\endgroup$
    – user262095
    Commented May 5, 2020 at 19:21
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ If the covariant derivative uses a Levi-Civita connection, the covariant derivative of the metric is zero by definition of that connection. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Commented May 5, 2020 at 19:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/47919/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented May 5, 2020 at 21:54

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I will give you a hint :

The components of a tensor $\mathbf{U}$ are $u_{st}^r$ the covariant derivative is $\nabla_k u_{st}^r$ it's given by $$\nabla_k u_{st}^r=\partial_k u_{st}^r+u_{st}^i \Gamma_{ki}^r-u_{it}^r\Gamma_{ks}^i-u_{si}^r \Gamma_{kt}^i$$

The covariant derivative of $\delta_i^k$ : $$\nabla_k \delta_s^r=\partial_k \delta_{s}^r+\delta_{s}^i \Gamma_{ki}^r-\delta_{i}^r\Gamma_{ks}^i=0+\Gamma_{ks}^r-\Gamma_{ks}^r=0$$ the same for $g_{ij}$

$$\nabla_{k}g_{ij}=\partial_k g_{ij}-g_{lj}\Gamma_{ki}^l-g_{il}\Gamma_{kj}^l$$ Since $\partial_k g_{ij}=\Gamma_{jik}+\Gamma_{kji}$, thus: $$\nabla_{k}g_{ij}=\Gamma_{jik}+\Gamma_{kji}-\Gamma_{kji}-\Gamma_{jik}=0$$ Therefore : $$\nabla_{k}g_{ij}=0$$ For $g^{ij}$ we have : $$\nabla_k g^{ij}=\partial_k g^{ij}+g^{lj}\Gamma_{lk}^i+g^{il}\Gamma_{lk}^j$$ Where : $$\partial_k g^{ij}=-g^{li}\Gamma_{lk}^j-g^{lj}\Gamma_{kl}^i$$ Hence : $$\nabla_k g^{ij}=0$$ Now you have your derivatives try to answer your question, note that $\mathrm{D} g_{ij}=\nabla_k \ g_{ij} \ du^k$.

Good luck with that.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I'll try it for sure ! $\endgroup$
    – user262095
    Commented May 5, 2020 at 20:12
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome $\endgroup$
    – user257151
    Commented May 5, 2020 at 20:12