0
$\begingroup$

I read derivation of kinematics equations using calculus:

$$a=\frac{\text dv}{\text dt}$$ $$\implies \text dv=a\text dt$$ $$\implies \int_{v_0}^v\text dv=\int_0^t a\text dt$$ $$\implies v-v_0=at$$ $$\implies v=v_0+at\tag1$$

I know finding antiderivatives and basic concepts of integration:

I cannot understand:

  1. How can we take $dt$ in the first equation to the other side when $dv/dt$ is not a fraction?

  2. In third equation how have we placed the upper and lower limits in LHS of velocity and in RHS of time?

  3. In third equation we have only $dv$ in LHS. Then what will be the function we are integrating?

Lastly can you please suggest some websites from where I can learn how to integrate both sides of an equation like done above.

Please provide me the answers.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ You should ask this rather in Mathematics. This is about basics of integration. It has nothing to do with physics $\endgroup$
    – Tojra
    Commented May 3, 2019 at 16:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ dv/dt is absolutely a fraction. It is the change in velocity divided by the change in time. Equation 2 comes from algebra. $\endgroup$
    – zeta-band
    Commented May 3, 2019 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ This post currently has 3 migration votes. However this question seems to use physics language even if the underlying issue is math. I close it as homework-like even if it isn't exactly homework partly to hinder migration. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented May 5, 2019 at 13:01

3 Answers 3

2
$\begingroup$
  1. Since the RHS in your first expression is a total derivative, it is OK to move the differentials around in this way.
  2. $v_0\equiv v(t=0)$ and $v\equiv v(t)$, i.e., the velocity limits of integration are just the velocities evaluated at the time limits of integration. Note that the velocity integral is abusing notation a bit, since the integration variable also appears as a limit of integration. A slightly better way to write this integral would be $$\int_{v_0}^vdv',$$ introducing the "dummy variable" $v'$ to act as the integration variable.
  3. The integrand on the LHS is 1 :)
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Could we also write $\int_{u(t_i)}^{u({t_f})}du(t)$ ? $\endgroup$
    – Anton
    Commented May 4, 2021 at 21:41
2
$\begingroup$

1) By error approximation we can show that $\frac{dy}{dx}$ is actually the ratio of dy and dx.

2)In the third equation acceleration a is constant, and the variables are velocity and time. SO we integrate with respect to their corresponding limits.

3) $dv = 1.dv$ . So the integrand is unity i.e, 1.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$
  1. $\dfrac{dv}{dt}$ is not a fraction, but it is the limit of $\dfrac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}$ which is a fraction. The trick here is to do the algebraic manipulations before taking the limit.

  2. The LHS integral is over the variable $v$, while the RHS is over the variable $t$, so the integration interval endpoints must be expressed in terms of values for the corresponding variable.

  3. The function is the constant function $1$ in this case: $dv = 1\cdot dv$.

The Wikipedia article on Infinitesimal has good information on the mathematical issues.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.