Given 3 ways of going downhill, like in this image:
Would a ball behave like that in real life? Intuitively, it makes no sense. The shortest path here is not the fastest.
Any hints to the math behind this?
Given 3 ways of going downhill, like in this image:
Would a ball behave like that in real life? Intuitively, it makes no sense. The shortest path here is not the fastest.
Any hints to the math behind this?
You asked for hints, so here they are:
It does behave like that in real life, sometimes the predictions from Physics are surprising, but they are often right.
In this video Michael from Vsauce in fact builds a Brachistochrone (the name of this kind of curve) and compares it to other trajectories, just like in your animation.
You can find many proofs of the brachistochrone equation, but I think what you need is another perspective:
The straight line is the shortest from A to B, you are right about that, but gravity is an acceleration, the longer you fall, the faster you fall.
In Real Life due to air resistance there is a terminal velocity, a point where gravity doesn't accelerate you anymore, that's why physics is all about approximations, and in this approximation, we are so far from terminal velocity, that we can completely ignore its existence.
The longer you fall the faster you fall, and once you have a lot of speed, it can be redirected in another direction, even upwards.
Seeing all these facts one could consider if it is possible for a path to exist in which we are falling so fast that we would have enough speed to reach point B before something traveling in a straight path, and there is!
Granted, once you consider that it could be possible to "use gravity more efficient" it isn't intuitive at all that the answer is "yes", nor it is intuitive what should be its shape, but that's what mathematics is for.