0
$\begingroup$

In order to describe a notion of rate of change of positon, in four-dimensional spacetime, we have to introduce the concept of four-velocity.

So, consider the following:

For a massive particle with position $x^{\mu}(t) = (x^{0},x^{1},x^{2},x^{3}) \equiv (x^{0},\vec{x})$ we define the coodinate velocity as:$$ v^{\mu} := \frac{dx^{\mu}}{dt} \equiv (c,\vec{v})\tag{1}$$ Where the spatial components of $(1)$ coincide with classical velocity vector and t is the coordinate time.

But, $(1)$ is not a vector object indeed, because the components didn't transforms as vectors under a lorentz transformation:

$$\frac{dx'^{\mu}}{dt'} = \Lambda^{\mu'}_{\nu}\frac{dx^{\nu}}{dt} \frac{dt}{dt'} = \frac{\Lambda^{\mu'}_{\nu}}{\Lambda^{0'}_{\nu}x^{\nu}}\frac{dx^{\nu}}{dt} \neq \Lambda^{\mu'}_{\nu}\frac{dx^{\nu}}{dt}\tag{2}$$

Well, I simply do not understand one elementary derivation:

--> It's not difficult to know the motivation for this definition:

$$ v^{\mu} := \frac{dx^{\mu}}{dt} \equiv (c,\vec{v})$$

I mean, we need a four-vector and this is certainly a intuitive candidate, but then we realized that this object are not invariant under lorentz transformation, ok. But I'm struggling to derive the expression:

$$\frac{dx^{\mu}}{dt'} = \frac{dx^{\mu}}{dt} \frac{dt}{dt'} \tag{3}$$

Which is important to make the analysis of coordinate transformation as in $(2)$. I know that this is simply the chain rule structure, but I simply do not see how to derive it! The classical chain rule is then:

$$\frac{df[x(t),y(t),z(t)]}{dt} = \frac{\partial f }{\partial x }\frac{dx }{d t}+\frac{\partial f }{\partial y }\frac{d y}{d t}+\frac{\partial f }{\partial y }\frac{d y}{d t}$$

How can I derive $(3)$ from chain rule,explicitly?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

You're misunderstanding the chain rule. For a function of a single argument, $$\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{du} \frac{du}{dx}.$$ You only get multiple terms on the right-hand side if the function has multiple arguments. Now, the position $x^\mu(t)$ is simply a collection of four functions, each of one argument, $t$. So you just use the ordinary chain rule. For example, for the first function, $$\frac{dx^0}{dt} = \frac{dx^0}{dt'} \frac{dt'}{dt}.$$ The same holds for $dx^1/dt$, $dx^2/dt$, and $dx^3/dt$, so we conclude $$\frac{dx^\mu}{dt} = \frac{dx^\mu}{dt'} \frac{dt'}{dt}$$ for $\mu \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I agree. As I understand the whole thing is derived as the following (in 1+1 dimensions; \mu = {0,1}): $$x^{\mu} = x^{\mu}(t'(t)) = [x^{0}(t'(t)), x^{1}(t'(t))] = $$ Then: $$\frac{dx^{\mu}}{dt}\vec{e}_{\mu} = \frac{dx^{0}}{dt}\vec{e}_{0} + \frac{dx^{1}}{dt}\vec{e}_{1} \implies $$ $$\frac{dx^{\mu}}{dt}\vec{e}_{\mu} = \frac{dx^{0}}{dt'}\frac{dt'}{dt}\vec{e}_{0} + \frac{dx^{1}}{dt'}\frac{dt'}{dt}\vec{e}_{1} \implies $$ $\endgroup$
    – M.N.Raia
    Commented Dec 1, 2018 at 21:53
1
$\begingroup$

When there are multiple variables in play, such as here $(t,x,y,z)$ it can be easy to get muddled on when we need partial derivatives, and when it is legitimate to give a total derivative. The central concept you need here is the concept of the worldline. This traces one particular line through spacetime. When we write a total derivative such as $dx^\mu /dt$ we are implicitly referring to this worldline. It is a statement about the difference $dx^\mu$ between adjacent events on the worldline. $dt$ is the coordinate time difference between those two events. It is only because we have this line, i.e. a one-dimensional or single-parameter entity, that total derivatives can be used. Once you know you have a single-parameter function, you can use expressions such as $$ \frac{df}{dr} = \frac{df}{ds} \frac{ds}{dr}$$ and thus, in your example, your eq (3).

But in the case of 4-velocity I think the reference you quoted is not going about it in the clearest way.

$dx^\mu$ is a 4-vector (an infinitesimal one) but $dt$ is not a Lorentz invariant scalar. To get a 4-vector you need to divide $dx^\mu$ by a Lorentz-invariant scalar. In the case of 4-velocity you divide $dx^\mu$ by the Lorentz invariant proper $d\tau$ time between the two adjacent events. Thus you get $$ \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}. $$

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.