3
$\begingroup$

How does one calculate four-momentum from the energy-momentum tensor $T_{\mu\nu}$? Would it be the eigenvector of the four-momentum tensor? If so, which eigenvector should be considered (in case of multiple eigenvectors)? If the answer is the time-like eigenvector, would this eigenvector be unique or it's possible there might be more than one time-like eigenvector? Also, what is the physical interpretation of the other eigenvectors?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ The four-momentum of what given the energy-momentum tensor? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 17, 2018 at 23:00
  • $\begingroup$ The four-momentum of the mass corresponding to the energy-momentum tensor. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 17, 2018 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I still don't understand what you mean. What is the four-momentum of a mass? What is the mass corresponding to an energy-momentum tensor? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 17, 2018 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ Let's say an object has the energy-momentum tensor $T_{\mu\nu}$. How does one calculate the four-momentum of this object from $T_{\mu\nu}$? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 17, 2018 at 23:05
  • $\begingroup$ Point particles don't have an energy-momentum tensor; the latter is a field-theoretic concept. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 17, 2018 at 23:11

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

You extract an energy-momentum vector from the stress-energy-momentum density by integration over a space-like 3-surface (whereas integration over a time-like surface would yield momentum fluxes). If your space-like surface is defined by the condition $t=\text{const}$, that means integrating the first column $T_{\mu0}$.

It might help to consider the invariant geometric objects involved, instead of just their coordinate representations:

For point particles, momentum is a covector $$ p_\mu\mathrm dx^\mu $$ For continuous media (fields and fluids), we have to promote this to a momentum density $$ \rho_\mu\mathrm dx^\mu\otimes\mathrm dV $$ where $$\mathrm dV = \mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz$$ is the 3-dimensional volume element. That is no longer an invariant object, as a change of frame will mix-in $$\mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\qquad \mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dz\qquad \mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz$$ By purely geometric reasoning, the energy-momentum vector thus has to be promoted to a tensor $$ T_{\mu\nu}\mathrm dx^\mu\otimes\star\mathrm dx^\nu $$ where we have represented the surface elements via their normal vectors by Hodge duality.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ OK. Thanks. I'm still not very clear. Let's say we have a point particle. Does it mean we have to integrate $T_{\mu0}$ of this particle to get its four-momentum? If so, over which volume one has to integrate? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 18, 2018 at 0:17
  • $\begingroup$ any volume that contains the particle - otherwise, you'll just get zero as a particle's density is given by a delta function $\endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Commented Feb 18, 2018 at 0:23
  • $\begingroup$ It's important to note that if the spacetime is curved as in GR, then the resulting four-momentum will not be constant over time - i.e. it will take on different values across nonintersecting Cauchy surfaces, unlike in the flat spacetime case. That's because Gauss's law fails for tensors of rank greater than 1 in curved spacetime. See near the end of here. $\endgroup$
    – tparker
    Commented Jun 29, 2018 at 21:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.