1
$\begingroup$

I can solve almost all my textbook problems related to current electricity using formulas but it seems in the end, I don't understand what current is. The bookish definition of current is:

Current is defined to be the amount of charge passed through a cross sectional area of a conductor per unit time.

I want to know, if how I think of current is right and, if possible, I would very much appreciate, if a better way of thinking current is provided.

Let us take a conductor and fix a cross sectional area and suppose there are $n$ free electrons on one side of the cross section which will eventually hit the cross section. We take a stop watch in our hand. And now when the electrons start moving, we start the stop watch. Now the electrons will randomly hit the cross section one by one or a few at once. After $1$ second, we stop the timer. We see that $x$ electrons have gone penetrating that cross section. Since charge of each electron is $e$,then $xe$ charge has flown in that one second. So current will be $xe$ A.

Is my line of thought correct? Specially do the points marked in italics matter? or just somehow the number of electrons penetrating that cross section in one second matter?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ see hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/miccur.html $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 19:42
  • $\begingroup$ well, electrical conduction is a quantum mechanical process your picture is closer to Drude model of conductivity. However reality is more complex, but it is safe to say that in actual conduction the electrons barely move. You should not think conduction as a liquid motion of electrons as if they are in a pipe, it is not correct. the speed of current is almost light speed, but obviously electrons are not moving at light speed. The better easy explanation of electron motion during conduction is this imgur.com/gallery/kD3DAwn/comment/462663554 $\endgroup$
    – physshyp
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 20:07

4 Answers 4

2
$\begingroup$

Yes this is a correct picture of current. Related concepts here could be drift velocity, which you might find helpful to supplement your understanding.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Understanding the difference between drift and diffusion current can be pretty important in different situations (particularly semiconductor device physics). $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 20:33
0
$\begingroup$

Now the electrons will randomly hit the cross section one by one or a few at once

No way one by one, or a few at once, is sufficient to obtain a measurable current.

Since the charge on a single electron in coulombs (C) is about 1.602 x 10$^{-19}$ C and since 1 A of current equals 1 coulomb of charge crossing the section per second, that means you need to have 6.24 x 10$^{18}$ electrons crossing the section per second for one ampere of current.

Since charge of each electron is $e$,then $xe$ charge has flown in that one second. So current will be $xe$ A.

Provided it is understood that the charge on each electron is 1.602 x 10$^{-19}$ C, then yes the current will be $xe$.

Hope this helps.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ You first say it can't be done, then you verify the OP's reasoning. I'm confused. Your argument against seems to rely on the phrase "one by one". How else can it be done? Electrons are discrete objects (classically); it's one by on by their very nature. Shot noise in a current is a real thing. $\endgroup$
    – garyp
    Commented Feb 24, 2022 at 12:08
  • $\begingroup$ @garyp Of course electrons are discrete units but that doesn’t mean that a collection of electrons crosses a surface one electron at a time. I was concerned the OP didn’t know what the charge on a single electron was and that the current is coulombs of electrons crossing a surface. That’s all. $\endgroup$
    – Bob D
    Commented Feb 24, 2022 at 12:30
0
$\begingroup$

I prefer the definition of current that is best applied to maxwells equations.

$I=\iint \vec{J} \cdot \vec{da}$

$\vec{J} = \rho \vec{V}$ (Current density)

$\rho$ is the charge density at a point in space ($\frac{Q}{m^3}$)

$\vec{V}$ is the velocity of the charge density at a point in space ($\frac{m}{s}$)

The flux transport integral is a measure of how much the flow of the quantity $\vec{J}$, flows directly through a surface. In this case, the cross section of a wire.

This integral has units

$\frac{Q}{m^3} \cdot \frac{m}{s} \cdot m^2$

$= \frac{Q}{s}$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Is my line of thought correct?

For the most part yes, it's correct, but I think you are not realizing that you are calculating the average current over a period of one second.

or just somehow the number of electrons penetrating that cross section in one second matter?

In the situation you are describing, it doesn't matter how (one by one or in a group) or at which point of this one-second period the electrons are crossing the surface. If the flow at a constant rate, or if all $x$ cross at once the last microsecond, the result is still $xe$ A. This, again, is because you're taking the average number of electrons crossing the surface oin one second. If you want to know the instant current over that second, you need to know how many electrons are crossing the surface at each point in time. Note that the current is no longer a single value, but a function of time, since the number of electrons crossing the surface will be a function of time:

$$I(t) = en_e(t)$$

where $n_e(t)$ is the number of electrons crossing the surface at a point in time. Using this expression requires you to know exactly how many electrons are crossing the surface at any given time. In other words, it does matter if electrons are crossing one by one or a lot at a time.

For electric circuits however, it is consider that the flow of electrons $n_e(t)$ is almost constant, which means that current itself is constant. Because of this, if you take the average current over a period of time (as you did in your example) it will be the same as the the instant current at any time, but note that this is only the case BECAUSE we are considering that the electrons cross the surface as a constant rate.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.