0
$\begingroup$

If there is a fixed point charge then it has its fields in the surrounding and it doesn't matter whether there is another charge near or not.

But for potential, it is defined as electric potential energy per unit charge and for potential energy we need two charges at least (in order to define a system).

But what if we just have a single fixed point charge. Will there be any potential near the charge ? Is it even meaningful to define potential in this case since there is nothing to have potential energy with ?

$\endgroup$

4 Answers 4

4
$\begingroup$

There's a difference between electric potential and electric potential energy. The potential energy is a single number, and tells you how much energy you need to construct the system starting from point charges that are infinitely far away. The potential is a function of space, and tells you how much energy you would need to bring a unit charge from infinity to a given spatial point, holding all the other charges fixed.

For an isolated charge, (ignoring the self-energy, that is the energy needed to make the charge in the first place), the potential energy is zero. Since there are no other charges around, no energy is needed to move this point charge from infinity.

However, the potential is not zero, in fact it is $kq/r$, where $k$ is Coulomb's constant, $q$ is the charge, and $r$ is the distance from a given spatial point to the point charge. The potential tells us how much energy we would need to give to another point charge with charge $Q=1\ {\rm C}$ (assuming we are working in SI units) to bring it from infinity to a given point in space, while holding the original point charged fixed.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Consider $N$ point charges $q_i$ at fixed positions $\mathbf{r}_i'$. The electric potential of these source charges is (taking the standard reference point of $V \rightarrow 0$ as $r\rightarrow\infty$) $$V(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\frac{q_i}{||\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}_i'||} \tag{1}.$$ Notice that this formula only makes reference to the positions and charges of the source particles. It is independent of the presence (or absence) of a "test charge." In the case of a single charge $q$ at position $\mathbf{r}'$, the sum in Eq. (1) reduces to a single term, the well-known Coulomb potential: $$V(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{||\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'||}.$$ The negative of the gradient of this potential is the electric field of the charge, a meaningful physical quantity. Electric potential, therefore, has meaning even in the case of an isolated point charge.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I'm referring specifically to the problem of $N$ point charges fixed in a set configuration. These bolted down charges are often called "source charges"-- they produce a certain electric field $\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})$ with a corresponding potential function $V(\mathbf{r})$. If a test charge $q$ then comes along, it experiences a force $q\mathbf{E}$ and its interaction energy with the source charges is $qV$. I'll edit my post to make that more clear. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ Even in the case of a conductor, when the source charges are free to move around, we are usually interested in the potential after the charges have settled down and the conductor has reached electrostatic equilibrium. So I think this scenario is actually quite general. In fact, if we let the charge distribution be continuous (just changing the sum to an integral in Eq. (1)), this becomes the general electrostatics problem. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ I appreciate you helping me refine my post. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30, 2021 at 3:28
  • $\begingroup$ Sounds good (+1). I deleted my comments... I'm worried they gave the impression there was something controversial. $\endgroup$
    – Andrew
    Commented Jul 30, 2021 at 3:33
0
$\begingroup$

Just as the electric field (in N/C) is defined in terms of the force on a “test” charge, the potential is defined (in J/C) in terms of the potential energy of a test charge at a point relative to a chosen reference point. One or more charges produce the field and potential at a point and another charge is needed to measure them.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The potential difference $V$ between two points is the work per unit charge required to move the charge between the two points. The potential difference between points 1 and 2 due to the electric field produced by a point charge $Q_1$ at point 1 does not depend on the existence of a unit charge at point 2. It equals the work required to move a unit charge $Q_2$ hypothetically located at point 2 to point 1, sometimes referred to as a "test charge".

The potential at point 1 due to the field generated by $Q_1$ requires one to define a point where the potential is zero (zero reference potential). While a theoretically arbitrary decision, for a point charge the zero reference is generally taken for $r=\infty.$ Then the potential difference is the work required to move a unit test charge from $\infty$ to point 1.

Hope this helps.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.