I'm trying to understand how to derive $-\vec{\nabla}V$ from $V_b-V_a=-\int\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}$. I'm not really familiar with the gradient operator, I know how to compute it and I know that $\vec{\nabla}=\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}$.
From that formula, I guess that writing $\vec{\nabla}f$ would give as result a vector whose direction depends on the increase/decrease of $f$ in the $x$, $y$ and $z$ directions (it would point towards the positive $x$ direction, positive $y$ direction and negative $z$ direction if $f$ is increasing in the $x$ and $y$ direction, and $f$ is decreasing in the $z$ direction), and the length of the vector in those directions depends on how much $f$ it's increasing and decreasing in those directions. I don't know if this is correct, I've never read anything about the $\vec{\nabla}$ operator, and the formula above is all I was given.
The book I'm reading derives that equation on the following page as follows.
The footnote is as follows.
What I don't understand is how is $-\vec{E}\cdot d \vec{l}=-E_ldl$? The dot product $\vec{E}\cdot d \vec{l}$ is equivalent to $E_xdx+E_ydy_+E_zdz$ or equivalent to $(E)(dl)cos(\theta)$ but I don't get how these last two are equivalent to $-E_ldl$. And I don't get how equation (8) is equal equation (9), which is equal to $-\vec{\nabla}V$.
Could you help me out please?