I'm just trying to get my head around the physics here and understand exactly what's going on, because there's a lot of conflicting information on the internet.
Viewed from an inertial reference frame in space i.e. looking at the earth, if a person is standing at a pole there are only two forces acting on them:
The normal force, and gravity.
So $mg - N_{p} = 0$
However, at the equator, the person is accelerating, and so:
$mg - N_{eq} = \frac{mv^2}{r}$
Which means that the normal force (the weight the person will measure at the equator) is reduced:
$N_{eq} = mg (1 - \frac{v^2}{rg})$
So the reduction in weight is not due to the centrifugal force.
However, if viewed from an observer in the rotating frame i.e. on the equator, they experience only the normal force $N$ and gravity $mg$.
So in theory, $N_{eq} - mg = 0$
However, this person knows (although they can't detect it) that they're rotating, so to reconcile that they add a fictitious force opposite to the direction of the centripetal force but equal in magnitude to it, called the centrifugal force:
$N_{eq} - mg + \frac{mv^2}{r} = 0$
which gives
$N_{eq} = mg (1 - \frac{v^2}{rg})$
Is my thinking correct here?
EDIT:
A further question I have is, why is there no coriolis force in this case? The reference frame is rotating, after all.