Timeline for Why is charge $q$ chosen as the variable of integration when converting from summation to integral form in electric field calculations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28 at 3:59 | comment | added | JEB | @shiguoxu yeah, I had grifth too, it's ayiat. But when I say what is that, I mean what is it? is it a little l or an I or i or a what? | |
| May 27 at 21:42 | vote | accept | guoxu | ||
| May 27 at 21:36 | comment | added | guoxu | @JEB The book I used is "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by David J. Griffiths, and the distance in it uses $\imath_1$ as the distance variable. It seems that next time when asking questions on this website, I should use more common symbols. | |
| May 27 at 15:49 | answer | added | JEB | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 27 at 15:36 | comment | added | JEB | what is that distance variable? Why not use $\vec r'$? | |
| May 27 at 14:57 | answer | added | march | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 27 at 14:14 | comment | added | The Photon | Suppose you have two of these point charges, say $q_7$ and $q_{23}$, that are both located at a distance of 3 cm from Q (but in different directions)... | |
| May 27 at 14:07 | history | edited | guoxu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 27 at 13:58 | history | asked | guoxu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |