Skip to main content

Questions tagged [philosophy-of-law]

Philosophy of law (or legal philosophy) is concerned with providing a general philosophical analysis of law and legal institutions. (ref. [IEP](https://iep.utm.edu/law-phil/)

10 votes
8 answers
5k views

Should I ever be influenced by an argument that I can't understand?

[Edit: Please read the whole question, or at least the new "N.b" paragraph, that I added just now to the end of the question, before attempting to answer it.] I'm asking this because ...
Matthew Christopher Bartsh's user avatar
7 votes
7 answers
3k views

What are philosophical arguments for the position that Intelligent Design is nothing but "Creationism in disguise"?

I would like to start this question quoting one of the comments to this answer to the question Does Intelligent Design (ID) entail an infinite regress of designers, and if so, is that problematic?. ...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
73 views

Philosophy of the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine

I'm looking for reference works in the fields of the Philosophy of Law and Political Science on the subject of the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine: the view that certain products of a legal/...
Evan Aad's user avatar
  • 121
13 votes
11 answers
4k views

Besides state punishment, are there any other reasons why one should not do crimes?

Committing crime can result in punishment by the judiciary. Assuming extreme skepticism and that there is no flawless proof of an absolute goodness, are there any reasons that why one should not do ...
An_Elephant's user avatar
-2 votes
3 answers
138 views

Can a trier-of-fact in a U.S.-based criminal trial overcome the observer's paradox in order to represent itself as an impartial trier-of-fact? [closed]

This post is to ask the entitled question, "Can a trier-of-fact in a U.S.-based criminal trial overcome the observer's paradox in order to represent itself as an impartial trier-of-fact?" I ...
Dennis Francis Blewett's user avatar
0 votes
5 answers
691 views

Do judges violate due process in their efforts to make a logical connection between would-be evidence and facts in question?

Note: I had this post with a question that follows, but then I reformed the question again. I've used ChatGPT to help me research this issue, and I think it has been somewhat helpful. For anyone ...
Dennis Francis Blewett's user avatar
-1 votes
2 answers
65 views

Jurisprudence and logic: Is it a necessary criterion for a claim to be declared sound that there be no evidence to the contrary as to its soundness?

So, I've been generating various arguments (such as related to the synthesis of legal arguments), and I have been doing my best to figure out how to declare that a particular claim is not sound. For ...
Dennis Francis Blewett's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
72 views

do courts or judges ever have an ethical responsibility to interpret a law a certain way?

assuming courts have the power to interpret a law as they see fit (subject to removal of judges through various procedures) do they have an ethical responsibility to interpret a law a certain way even ...
OldAccount2005's user avatar
4 votes
5 answers
1k views

Can non-agents be moral or immoral?

Human children and non-human animals are denied moral status or equal consideration with human adults due to their lack of consciousness, reason or autonomy They are not moral agents or subjects of ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,989
0 votes
4 answers
106 views

(philosophy of law) how broadly can statutes be interpreted by courts? [closed]

In constitutions and legal systems like that of America , Australia and India (and other states with separation of powers), if a statute has more than one possible interpretation, then can and should ...
OldAccount2005's user avatar
1 vote
6 answers
1k views

Why is consent important?

We cannot see or feel consent. Why is it important when its existence cannot be proven? The importance of consent seems to rely on the principle of respect for autonomy or self-determination; for one ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,989
0 votes
2 answers
119 views

What do atheists (atheistic philosophers) think about the Spirit of Law? [closed]

I thought that spirit is something belongs to the god's nature or to God. How I should to understand the existence of the Spirit of Law? Are the laws the documents, rules and instructions written on ...
άνθρωπος's user avatar
5 votes
8 answers
454 views

Why is the rule of the law so easily damaged or broken?

Why is the rule of law so difficult to keep once established? Is it because of the limitation of law, or something to do with human emotions and behavior? We cannot break laws of nature, but law made ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,567
4 votes
4 answers
158 views

what does "universal experience of a transcendental subject" mean?

I've been reading Bourdieu, P. (1986). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings LJ, 38, 805. and encountered the concept on page 819. The tendency to conceive of the ...
Maul Seil's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
69 views

How have successful governments legislated morality?

In what ways has law fostered a culture of clear morality? Are there objective measurements to state what would be beneficial to the people which laws are meant for? I'm very interested in ways that ...
saintmeh's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2
3 4 5
11