3

I understand that after Nietzsche got rid of objective morality in his philosophical process, he went ahead and claimed that even though there is no objective morality that his personal philosophy deems that one has to live life and was kind of an advocate for stoicism and even brought forth the idea of the Ubermensch and so his personal philosophy was to do 'good' to others and be kind as long as it guarantees one's life or improvement of it.

But my question is, isn't he subscribing to the idea that 'life' is good and therefore inherently accepting the idea that some things are inherently good.

I mean, I agree, one cannot necessarily say or logically argue that death is 'good' in the nihilist sense and therefore believe this and go forth to attain it.

7

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .