Suppose person A engages in
- not thinking anything concerning a given scenario (scenario C) by not thinking about the scenario (scenario C)
Person B can read person A's mind and respond to their thoughts (by saying things, that A can hear and react to). Or, at least, this is what person A thinks.
If person B says to person A they are (i.e., that person A is) a coward (a person that does not face one's own actions), then, will person A, be brought to do the opposite (in thought formation) and have their thought, as read from (person A's mind's) history, as relating to scenario C, be brought out (i.e., the thought forms, becoming, visible, in person A's mind) only if A has participated in scenario C via a physical or thought action (in the past, as concerning the part in the mind they are avoiding but is still a little bit present in the mind)?
Sorry for the post's complexity.
It cannot be explained in an easier manner.
Thanks.