What is the consensus on merging or symlinking knowledge and epistemology? Are there any reasons why we should need both tags?
Although I was in favour of retaining epistemology at first (probably because of academic jargon), it may be more useful to retain knowledge, as it is definitely a more user-friendly option.
[knowledge]
, it will automatically map to the master tag,[epistemology]
. (cc @stoicfury)[knowledge]
as a topic is not per se part of[epistemology]
or[phil-of-science]
. However, one part of philosophy.stackexchange.com/q/1641/1582 has been discussed in phil of sci under the topic of relevance as a requirement of scientific facts (opposed to, say, commonsense facts); the other part under the heading ethical implications of science. So the q can be tagged with those discipline-tags.