Timeline for Is SuperUser for IBM/PC only?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
May 26, 2015 at 17:33 | vote | accept | tinlyx | ||
May 26, 2015 at 16:44 | answer | added | James Mertz | timeline score: 2 | |
May 25, 2015 at 6:41 | comment | added | tinlyx | @Bob Thanks for the clarification. I don't think it's possible either. Just wanted to ask to clarify. I would propose the change as you suggested. But obviously, I don't know this website enough to propose changes. Hopefully this will raise some questions for others to think about scoping issues. | |
May 25, 2015 at 2:48 | comment | added | Bob | @tinlyx It's impossible to accurately describe an entire site by just the name. That's what the on-topic and off-topic sections of the help centre and new-user tour are for. Again, tablets are a blurry area - especially iOS, which has more in common with phones than desktop computers. The other part is that the decision to allow some tablet questions wasn't really publicised, so some users will still VtC. | |
May 25, 2015 at 1:02 | comment | added | tinlyx | I agree. In fact, my first SU question was about routers and networks, and I was directed here from ServerFault as they told me non-professional server admin problems belong here. As a user, you can't really tell from SE website names these days. SuperUsers answer Excel questions and ServerFault does not like router questions. Have the veterans considered these naming issues when directing folks around? | |
May 25, 2015 at 0:51 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I'd also add, there's a site specifically for apple gear where this would be on topic. Tablets are a bit of a wierd place for us, historically. | |
May 25, 2015 at 0:11 | history | edited | tinlyx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 539 characters in body
|
May 25, 2015 at 0:05 | comment | added | tinlyx | @bob Thanks for the explanation. Please see my update. | |
May 25, 2015 at 0:04 | answer | added | Bob | timeline score: 2 | |
May 24, 2015 at 23:37 | history | asked | tinlyx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |