9

I was trying to ask a question about the Filament rendering system. It occurred to me that there were two more specific tags regarding "filament": and , which refer to different libraries. Looking at the criteria for burnination:

  • Does it describe the contents of the questions to which it is applied? and is it unambiguous?

It is definitely ambigious, as I said before: it describes potentially two different libraries.

  • Is the concept described even on-topic for the site?

Technically, no. Filament has nothing to do with programming. But it also refers to two libraries, as Shog9 put it: "Stack Overflow doesn't need a kittens tag, at least not until someone releases a hot new framework and names it 'Kittens'" So yes, it is on topic.

  • Does the tag add any meaningful information to the post?

No. If you are using the correct tags for your library (/), then adds nothing.

  • Does it mean the same thing in all common contexts?

No. If you have it refers to one library, and if you have or it refers to another.

0

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
7

Yep. This tag's entirely redundant.

The following three questions have been retagged to :

This question tagged has had the tag removed:

I also added the tag to several questions that had other Laravel-related tags. At this point, all 32 remaining questions tagged were also tagged .

I then merged into without creating a synonym, retagging those 32 questions and adding to the 15 of them that did not already have it.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .