How to deal with mass typos fixing, should they be a part of homepage?

This sort of thing has been discussed repeatedly on various sites. Many sites have their own specific policies about it, like Sci-Fi. Other sites have no rules or explicitly allow (or even encourage) bulk edits - for example, on Stack Overflow in English they will often have tag burns where they are working as a group to remove/retag questions to get rid of a specific tag.

But there's no consistent "right" answer and I tend to see feelings on this front vary depending on how active the front page is.

• SO's front page refills every 10 minutes or less with active posts, so "flooding" it is practically impossible and, even if it were flooded, many of the active community members use filtered views or look at tag activity pages rather than the front page.
• Smaller sites (like SFF) have far fewer active posts per day so many of the community members just use the home page as their way to review activity on the site. In this case, flooding the front page with significant numbers of tiny edits requires the users to go in search of new posts.

One other thing is to think about how we restrict the number of posts the Community Bot bumps. While we have restrictions for how many posts it bumps per hour (1 or 4 depending on the site), we can also enable restrictions for whether any of the n most recently active posts were edited by Community and prevent the bot from bumping at all.

So, some sites will create policy that takes activity into account - for example, they'll say that as long as fewer than five of the posts on the front page are not part of the bulk editing, more edits can be made.

Personally, I'm a big proponent of making good edits to improve readability, even if that merely means needing to edit one letter. One thing that often happens in these cases is that the editor will make a single minor edit because they've used search or SEDE to get a list of all of the posts with that same error and then they just blindly make that single edit.

This sort of editing is detrimental in my opinion. While it may be fixing a typo, which is good, failing to review the entire post and make any other edits while fixing that single character issue just draws attention to an editor who's not being very thoughtful about the edits they're making. While this may be fine if there truly are no other edits to make, when it comes to bulk edits like this, it can quickly become very frustrating for other users.

As to your specific request, there's been a lot of discussion over the years about how to address this and a lot of ideas have been thrown around such as changing what the home page shows, allowing users to customize what they see on the home page, creating a "minor edit" indicator and letting users opt out of seeing those minor edits, or the one you linked about putting them in a review queue but they all create a lot of possibly-unnecessary complexity in something that's relatively simple.

I'm not going to mark this as status-declined specifically but, in the grand scheme of what we can prioritize and build, while this is something people often discuss, I haven't seen a huge push to actually address it on a network-wide level. And, since sites have successfully created policy for this, I think that's the preferred option here.