Why do you stay?

Mi Yodeya.

I stay for this fantastic community, a community of people who care about each other and help each other while we all, together, build an amazing collection of questions and answers about everything from the details of obscure talmudic passages to the practical issues of observing Shabbat on other planets. The community has also come together for several community projects, including publications and (currently) a distributed learning program.

While here I've found other great communities too. Mi Yodeya is the anchor of all that I do here.

I hope that, when all this mess is done one way or the other, I can continue to participate. I hope that daily reminders of the pain and harm done to me will not impede me. I don't know how that will work out yet.

Sharing knowledge is addictive

... at least it is for me, and despite all its shortcomings, Stack Exchange is the best platform for it.^{[citation not needed]}

I should have known about the addictiveness; when I'm at the office, I'm getting all kinds of questions from colleagues asking to explain how X works or how to solve problem Y. That often happens at inconvenient moments, like when I'm fully focused on another complicated problem. Still, being that Person That Knows Everything is tremendously gratifying.

You can be that person on Stack Exchange as well, and most importantly: you can turn it off when it's not convenient for you! I'm aware that this holds true for all online communities (and even some offline ones) but here I feel my contributions have the most value for people around the world. I joined Stack Overflow because I noticed it saved me and my colleagues countless hours of work, more than any of the other programming sites. I wanted to give something back and be part of that awesome community producing high quality solutions.

Then I discovered Meta Stack Overflow (and later Meta Stack Exchange), which helped me become a better Stack Overflow / Stack Exchange citizen, more than any of the other resources. I wanted to give something back and be part of that awesome community producing high quality meta-solutions. The rest is history, I guess ...

I'm staying to see how this PR disaster will pan out

Pan out
PHRASAL VERB
1. End up; conclude.

‘he's happy with the way the deal panned out’

Example:

“Green, speaking to the Sunday Herald last night, said: ‘We'll just have to wait to see how it pans out this week.”
_{Lexico, formerly Oxford Dictionaries}

It's like watching a train (not a car, it's far worse than that) crash in slow motion, you know how it's going to end but you can't do anything to stop it.

My contributions on EL&U and ELL were already dwindling by the time Stack Exchange committed hara-kiri by firing Monica Cellio. The contributions have since halted to a standstill. I've stopped investing energy and passion on these two sites, I've stopped posting quality questions, and answering to them. I am no longer invested in EL&U or ELL. I'm here on Meta for the ride.

The decomposition began last year when the ugly responsive desktop theme was imposed on EL&U (Yes, I continue to dislike it, it has never grown on me, and it never will.) Despite the numerous posts on EL&U meta, the constructive criticisms, and the passion displayed by some of its most veteran users, very few changes were made. The CM, probably shaken by the downvotes–which are risible compared to nowadays on Meta–professed on December 4 2018:

[emphasis mine]

This site was probably the hardest site for me for a variety of reasons. I'm still learning how to accept criticism without being hurt by it and this site design failed you all in a way that I wasn't prepared for. I appreciate and treasure your clear care for this site and wanting it to feel like home - and a place you want to be. I want you to be here, too, and want you to feel welcome and comfortable.

Lies.

As to the design of the site and wanting its users to feel welcome again, there's been a deafening silence from the Community Manager since December 2018. The last update is dated December 10, 2018, and the EL&U's logo banner was not centred. No compromise was offered either.

But the silence worked!! It worked “folks”, users carried on posting, the mods carried on moderating, Google carried on attracting visits to EL&U. So, SE was absolutely right in employing this tactic. One hundred per cent. Ignore the gripes about the responsive theme, ignore the disgruntled veteran users, everyone will eventually forget and get on with it, and the new users will be none the wiser.

When you see how the executives mistreated someone of the calibre of Monica Cellio, and you realize that their letters of apologies were only a Public Relations stunt, when you see through the façade and the tactics, you finally stop caring about the company. We don't work here, they don't help pay our bills or put food on our table.

I participated on EL&U and ELL because I enjoy learning about the English language, and because I learnt so much from reading answers, posted as far back as 2010, by real experts in linguistics, who, incidentally, have also stopped contributing. Today, I can probably count four experts in linguistics, and four English enthusiasts who consistently produce quality contributions. This slump coincides with the low quality of questions (and answers), which on EL&U has been happening since 2016. Don't ask me for proof. Just take my word for it.

However, I will always be grateful to EL&U and ELL, I used to enjoy myself and I used to enjoy helping users understand a little bit more about the English grammar and the etymology of words (I count myself as an enthusiast, not an expert). I am grateful to the remaining mods who run a tight ship, I could never do their job.

I stay for the users. The people who come to ask questions, the people who answer those questions, and the people who seek to make those questions and answers better for those few who search before asking.

That’s what I’m here for.

Frame challenge:

I'm not staying. Within 24 hours this post will appear to have been written by a deleted account.

Reasons for leaving:

• Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow have moved to CC BY-SA 4.0 - despite the rules clearly binding both parties, SE doesn't care about the rules
• Attempt 1 to gaslight the community
• Attempt 2 to gaslight the community
• Attempt 3 to gaslight the community

When I started out as a system administrator, more than 20 years ago, there was no Stack Exchange. There also wasn't a Google.

What there was was Usenet, IRC, and a thing called LysKOM that only a few people in Sweden used. On all three of those places, perfect strangers helped me figure stuff out, and I returned the favour. I found friends, even lovers, even a husband, there, and many of those relationships are still going strong a couple of decades later, even though Usenet is all but dead and IRC has mainly moved to Slack.

When I found Server Fault, I pretty much immediately started answering questions. I want to help new sysadmins the way that those other people helped me when I was new. I enjoy my work, and I love solving problems, and more than once I've found solutions to my own problems while working on some question there.

For quite a few years now, I've spent at least a little time on Server Fault each day, looking for some question where I can give a good answer that will help others. But during those same years, the community that was there when I started has dwindled. I've still hung around, though.

Until now. At present I am doing nothing on any non-meta site - no voting, no queue checking, no answering or editing. I'm not going to give any more free work to Stack Exchange until they sort this out. I do realize that my flounce is not going to affect their bottom line in any way. But this isn't about their bottom line - it's about my conscience. I don't want to be part of what they're making it.

I'm most active on Code Review. I have been a moderator there on 2 separate occasions - initially as a Pro-Tem moderator as the site was growing rapidly, then again, later, as an elected moderator as the site was more stable.

I firmly believe that Code Review is helping programmers become better programmers, and it's increasing the net value of people in the industry (and school systems). It is a great way for people to share their knowledge, in a positive, mentoring way. It's also a great way for new programmers, or experienced programmers that are new to a language, or a new technique, get peer review in a positive-criticism mechanism.

Bottom line, Code Review offers a lot, it is a site I am passionate about, and have put many years of volunteer hours in to.

I am resigning my moderator position as a result of a number of factors, but I will not be leaving Code Review. It is a good place to be in spite of the turmoil outside of that specific site.

In a sense, Code Review is lucky because people who choose to post questions on the site have to accept that they are making themselves vulnerable... they have to ask: "Here's some code I wrote that I think is OK, but can you tell me what I screwed up?" ... that question puts a lot of trust in us to give feedback without being judgmental. When people come with that vulnerability, and are handled with respect, it essentially automatically ensures that any other discourse is civil, and polite, and it's a nice place to be.

The fact that we are such a successful "second-tier" site on Stack Exchange is a testament to the great community that has chosen to share their time with others to help them to improve themselves.

I like that community, and I want to be a part of it.

That's why I am sticking around (even if I am not a moderator for long).

I'll give you as honest an answer as I can, with some context. My reasons for staying have evolved over time. Recent events have sorta been a reality check for me, making me give SE some hard thought I would otherwise not have done.

Until maybe a year ago, I thought SE was the best thing since sliced bread. I became addicted to the place and really enjoyed being here. I became perhaps too invested, both emotionally and in terms of time and effort spent here.

Then SE's focus moved away from content quality. I stuck around because it is satisfying to help people solve problems, and I still felt it important to help curate the sites I spent time on. My participation became more "in spite of" SE corporate than because of it. Over the years, I had invested a ridiculous amount of time and effort, and still felt tied to the sites, but the environment was starting to burn me out.

The recent events disgusted me and were kind of a last straw. I was about to walk away from SE when David Fullerton posted his apology.

It made me take a step back and reflect. If I was so disgusted with SE, why did I spend a week, or whatever the period was, glued to MSE and venting in posts and comments? Why did I care?

I came across a post where somebody observed that anger meant that the person still cared, whereas apathy meant the person no longer did. I thought I had been getting apathetic over the last year, but I realized that I still care about the sites, themselves.

I decided to delay any action to see how things fall out. "Why" I stay is no longer a simple question. The "why" part of it will balance positives and negatives (and won't be easy). For me, if I stay it will be more a question of "how"; the nature of my participation.

I suspect it will be a long time before I feel invested in the place again and would consider volunteering for a moderator position. If SE totally makes things right with Monica, comes up with a reasonable CoC, and starts focusing again on quality, I will stay for the same reason I originally joined -- it's the best platform for building knowledge and helping people solve problems. If I want to continue these activities, it would be hard to find a better venue to do it. I will continue to help curate the sites I use. And because it's addicting.

Short of those changes by SE, I would have to do more soul searching. I would likely participate for less altruistic reasons; at a minimum, I could see using SE for my own questions, maybe answering an occasional interesting question to help someone else. Who knows how that might change over time. If SE continues to treat experienced users as commodities, or continues policies that make quality less important, I probably wouldn't continue to volunteer my time curating sites. But if the terms of the new CoC aren't something I can endorse, remaining will be untenable, regardless of the reasons I might prefer to stay.

I stay because of the gamification.

Virtual scores are the nicotine of the 21st century.

I keep using Stack Exchange as my main question-answering website because, unlike Reddit, Quora, Yahoo Answers, etc.:

• user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 4.0 (with attribution required)
• official data dumps are provided
• noisy contributions are often removed
• the UI is decent

so I don't see any better, well-frequented alternatives, even though Stack Exchange is far from perfect (data dump is incomplete, roomba has removed well over 100 of my questions, moderation is sometimes arbitrary, some Stack Exchange employees have insulted me and had derogatory comments/actions against me despite me staying respectful all the time to anyone because it is more time efficient anyway, the text editor being subpar, overlapping Stack Exchange websites that fragments the community such as AI vs. DS vs. CV, the UI isn't compact enough, etc.). The numerous issues I had with Stack Exchange over time definitely caused my question-to-answer ratio to increase by a lot.

I don't.

To be more specific, I have long since left the SE community I was most active in, with no regrets and no looking back.

Although I would have liked things to have been different, I ultimately realised that a situation involving bad behaviour by two moderators, followed by the same close-ranks/circle-the-wagons approach we've seen in more recent events, together with a level of silence effectively amounting to approval of that from the CM team, was not a community I wanted to be a participating member of.

I still remain in some SE communities but my actual participation is a tiny fraction of what it was, and recent events have only served to affirm that I made the right decision years ago. SE is on a trajectory that is actively harmful to it as a community. It doesn't value subject matter experts, it doesn't value people who put in hard work, and it doesn't value the hard work they put in. Nothing I've seen over the past few weeks changes that opinion, although I suppose that one positive outcome is that at least it's all out in the open now.

I stay because there is nowhere to go.

I also enjoy the amusing and tragic spectacle around the latest CoC and how people argue about how we should address completely anonymous, unverified and random accounts.

I don't care who is asking questions or writing answers. You might be straight, LGBT, a giraffe or a reptile. The only thing that counts is knowledge.

Luckily, there seem to still be a few people who think the same and find this entire hurly-burly pathetic.

You can address me as he/she/your majesty/friend/brother/whatever - as long as you have good intentions and don't call me names I don't mind.

TL;DR: I stay because there are still good people around, even inside Stack Exchange itself.

It took me a while to realize the above. At first I was just furious, then sad, but I didn't see any hope. It was all black, with SE doing evil things and everyone suffer.

But then, two events in a single day made a change:

1. I read several awesome posts from awesome people, that I missed before. One was from George (Stocker), who, even though resigning, stayed as an active user to help the community, not SE.

2. Someone I know popped up on Meta after not being around for long time, and made me realize it's not all dark. We can still do the things we did before, even if trust with the platform owners is damaged or even lost forever. It doesn't matter who runs the place behind the scenes; it matters who is inside the place. And there's still room for fun and for good things.

That was about two weeks ago. Since then, nothing major happened, neither good nor bad. This is bad by itself, but not enough to break my decision.

So I'm here, not happy with SE at all, but putting it aside for the good of the people who are still here too, and the people inside SE who still work hard to make this a better place, even when their voice is not heard.

I am strongly tempted to leave. But...Act in haste, Repent at leisure. Often used about marriage and sometimes about tattoos. Big Brother SE might/could do enough to persuade me to stay. Monica has to be made whole. We can't expect dazzling speed now that this has ballooned into a major rebellion. SE understandably needs to consult lawyers.

What has caused me to enjoy my sites (mainly TGO and ELU, but others too) since May 2015 is that I learn fascinating things. For example, singular they came up on ELU several years ago, completely unconnected with the current mess. It has been part of grammar for hundreds of years. Also, I have become acquainted with knowledgable and lovely people.

My advice is not to stay for the Rep points, although they are mildly addictive, but for what you can learn.

Simple. Such sites have helped me a lot in my time.

So, right now I have experience and knowledge to help others. That's it.

I'm a humanist, and I like helping other people. Even if my contributions are not upvoted or accepted, they are still viewed hundreds if not thousands of times. That's helping mankind along, although cryptography is of course not earth science (something we need more than crypto, if you ask me).

Stack Exchange has a great concept. Although there are many, many issues with it, as a Q/A gaming site it does work, and it works well. The separate concepts of questions, answers, comments, chat and of course the voting and reputation works rather well. There have been many tries to get something similar working, but this still seems to be the best option available.

As for moderation, I guess that grows on you. First you get to Stack Exchange to ask or get answers. Usually you start from a generic Internet search engine and get to find a few questions / answers here. Then you start finding questions that have gone unanswered or you start asking questions yourself. In the beginning you get spurred on by badges, later on by reputation and before you know it you're hooked.

Later on you start editing these questions you answer because well, what's a good answer without a good question? Don't they need good tags to go with them? Before you know it one of your favorite mods quits, you're having a bit more spare time than usual and all your online friends are spurring you to participate. And there you are, you've got a diamond attached to your (nick)name.

My crypto questions and answers have been seen about 5 million times on SO and 2 million times on crypto.SE. I mean, 7 million views for a niche topic such as cryptography? Darn, that must make some kind of impact, right? And that's just in my spare time!

Besides that, I'm just a small time cryptographer compared with some of the aces on the network. Heck, some of our users are university professors. Imagine what I have learned myself!

As for the turmoil, you have to remember that there won't be heated discussions over a platform that users don't care about. Those platforms are simply left behind. Even with the huge mistakes by the Stack Exchange team, most users and mods are still trying to make the site better. Hopefully we will succeed in doing that, or the site will get marginalized in the end.

I stay:

• to protect my "investment". I am one of the (currently) 275 holders of a legendary badge on stackoverflow.com. Many, many days spent there to get to +200 reputation by the end of the day. Walking away, and leaving that behind? No way.
• to help. Seriously: I like to answer questions. Tough ones, easy ones. A new user coming back "gosh, you saved my day", or an experienced user coming back "wow, I didn't know one could do that" ... that feels just great.
• to help, even when people don't want that help. As in: voting on low quality content, giving feedback to new users how to improve their input, so that we actually can help them.

And for some of the real top contributors, SO for example is a place where they interact with the readers who bought their books. So that site directly relates to the "book selling" part of some people's businesses.

Sure, I kinda lost most, if not all my trust towards Stack Exchange Inc, but as written elsewhere: I don't want to give up these other things, so I intend to continue, albeit with slower pace.

Having said that, it really doesn't feel that good. The more Stack Exchange Inc. isn't reacting in meaningful, constructive ways the harder it feels to stay here. It is really like: leaving everything behind OR staying, but knowing to contribute to a place where I have zero trust towards the people running the service.

A small update: the fact that I don't trust the company doesn't mean to reject the chance to work with them. And when giving feedback to "them" results in such a response, then there is still ground for hope.

I'm mostly active on Interpersonal Skills, and the answers that I've gotten to questions I've asked there have helped me navigate some areas of life that are extremely tricky for me.

Beyond those answers though, to expand on Snow's answer, I stay for the community. The users of IPS are amazing people who I've gotten to know by spending time in the site's chat room. I care about them and what's going on in their lives, and they care about me and what's going on in mine. As a person on the autism spectrum, I sometimes have trouble fitting in. I'm not about to throw away an amazing place where I feel a sense of belonging just because the company that hosts it is having trouble engaging well with its user base.

I am staying because if we leave, they win.

I'm mostly active in Programming Puzzles because I'm learning a lot from other people. I've learned about the current situation from users on that site. The community there (unlike on SO) is very supportive, and has helped me a lot.

I won't give up until the current problem is solved. I support Monica and as a normal user, the only thing I can do is stay, upvote, comment, show that I am still active.

I think the priority at SO now is selling a product to people who want the technology without the community. They are focusing on their software and business, and pushing policies to the moderators in order to avoid interacting with them and trying to solve issues with personal interaction. It's easier to publish a set of rules, say "now RTFM", implement an algorithm and punish some random sample than trying to understand on a case-by-case basis what went wrong, and why, and try to improve in the process.

They are ignoring the community, because it's not important for their strategic vision. Stack Exchange is now just a showcase for their product, they have a lot of user-generated content as a selling point, and don't care (nor do they need to) if people are upset. They just need to show some content in order to sell the container.

I haven't contemplated leaving for several reasons:

1. I've never had the illusion that Stack Exchange is a friendly organization dedicated to helping its users. In reality, it's just a soulless corporation dedicated to maximizing profits for its shareholders. As long as you approach SE from that angle, it doesn't seem so bad anymore. And hey, as a libertarian I cannot be opposed to soulless corporations :)
2. SE content is shared with a Share-Alike license, so it could be migrated with ease if it ever turns into a complete mess.
3. It remains the best platform on the Internet for sharing one's knowledge. Nothing else came close in all these years.

I don't actively participate anymore.

I stopped after the "welcoming" blog post. I was worried before it when I saw that IPS was unfairly moderated and only content based on socially progressive ideology was allowed and content based on other worldviews was deleted.

At least back then it was confined to one Stack Exchange site which was problematic and opinion based in any case. After seeing the "welcoming" blog I realized that SO wants to do the same thing everywhere and SO as a whole is no longer a place that welcomes and includes different worldviews and opinions.

SO is not the first place that is ruined by people with socially progressive ideology. I saw it happen over and over again, and I knew what's coming after the welcoming blog. I knew that something like the current debacle is just a matter of time, and it's only going to get worse.

I'm glad that more and more people are finally realizing it and leaving. I still have a very slim hope that if enough people leave, SO will change their ways and it will once again be the great site that it once were. That's one of the reasons I still follow what's going on, but mostly I just stay to watch the train wreck unfold. It's addicting and masochistically enjoyable.

Why do you stay?

Stack Overflow gets 10M visits per day and while the other site's visit count pales by comparison we have a dozen sites with all questions answered and a few dozen more with almost as much success.

It's important to stay and help those people.

If 10% of those people had a complaint we would certainly know. While all can not be perfect I feel that there has been both an improvement and a shortfall over the years.

In addition to helping others you are free to help yourself. You can learn about things you didn't want to know, things you didn't know you wanted to know about, and also what you didn't know about things you profess to know.

Often you can search and find an answer to your question, but if you are unsuccessful you can ask; sometimes an expert in the field will be the one to answer, other times the person answering may not be an expert but the answer is still very useful.

Asking is free, and it's free to read the existing answers.

Sometimes we have improvements and sometimes there are detours - those are free too.

Quitting doesn't get your questions or concerns answered. But you can lurk for free.

Thick skinned and thin skulled or thin skinned and thick skulled - it's your blood pressure.

Sometimes it's very difficult to determine if you've helped anyone on a particular day, particularly if there are few visits to the question and the person asking apparently hasn't returned.

Other times it's clear that you were able to help, and that people are appreciative.

It's sometimes a similar experience for learning, some questions and answers are extremely complicated and require some brushing up on the basics to get up to speed. Sometimes it's difficult to grasp the Q&A but you learn something else instead.

A better question than "why do we stay" could be: "Where is the grass greener?".

Without prejudice or slight (in some ways we fall short but in others we exceed) it's like:

• The House of Knowledge

  The library's collection was so vast that historian, Ibn Abi Tayyi’ described it as a "Wonder of the world". Historian Ahmed Bin Ali Maqrizi says "The House of Wisdom in Cairo did not open its doors to the public except before the furnishing, decoration and beautification of all the doors and corridors, and many servants were appointed. And the number of shelves in forty cabinets, each one of them could accommodate about eighteen thousand books. And (the shelves) were open, and books accessible to everyone. And one who wants a book, then the book can be easily found by him. If a book cannot be found by oneself, one can seek the help of hired handlers."

• The Myth of Er

  With many other souls as his companions, Er had come across an awe-inspiring place with four openings – two into and out of the sky and two into and out of the ground. Judges sat between these openings and ordered the souls which path to follow: the good were guided into the path into the sky, the immoral were directed below. But when Er approached the judges, he was told to remain, listening and observing in order to report his experience to humankind.

• The Chariot Allegory

  Plato paints the picture of a Charioteer (Greek: ἡνίοχος) driving a chariot pulled by two winged horses:

  "First the charioteer of the human soul drives a pair, and secondly one of the horses is noble and of noble breed, but the other quite the opposite in breed and character. Therefore in our case the driving is necessarily difficult and troublesome."

Your account indicates that you are new here. Have a look around.

Very similar to my answer on this question, I stay because I enjoy helping people and contributing to the community.

I'm also horribly addicted. I currently have a 1700 day streak on SO. One does not do something for 1700 days straight then simply walk away because speed bumps begin coming up.

I'm holding on because I love the community (SO was a major part in my development as a programmer), and I don't want to see it go down. Management may be doing sketchy things behind the scenes, but that doesn't mean that the greastest IT resource on the web needs to entirely suffer and burn because of it.

As I said in my other answer, I'll keep contributing until I can no longer continue in good consciousness. We're certainly closer to that point than we were half a year ago, but we haven't reached the arbitrary line that I have in my head yet.

I am here to help people, period.

I help people by sharing what I have learned in the hopes I can either spare people some pain or help them avoid it all together.

Add to it my recent honor to serve as moderator for TWP.

That’s why I am here.

Because this is the only wiki Q&A website I know of. Quora (besides that annoying log in wall), for example too much on WHO answers the question, but not on the question themselves. You can't edit their answer either.

I find that comments on answers are also helpful when the answers are not complete, and the comment points out something which may in the end help you. I like that you can see duplicate questions.

Do you know any alternatives? Can you link me to one? A place where I can ask questions about anything, and answer them even after they have already been answered, all I want is a wiki-based Q&A site, if you know one, let me know.

Why do you stay?

I suspect the expected answer is "I don't like Stack Exchange, but...". But honestly, I think many people are forgetting that Stack Exchange is truly awesome!

My answer has two parts:

1. I'm here for a free education. Stack Exchange provides free web hosting for a huge amount of educational material. They provide a professionally maintained Q&A website for free. Compare this to enrolling in a university course (tens of thousands of dollars), or buying textbooks (which are expensive, and there's no interactivity).

2. I've learned to ignore drama. Every single Internet forum I've ever used has some drama: if you pack your bags and move somewhere else, it'll just be some other drama elsewhere. I've become desensitized.

I do not care if Stack Exchange makes money through ads. In fact, good for them.

I am still here so that I can majorly contribute to Movies & TV. I am an ex-moderator from Hinduism and Movies & TV and quit due to personal reasons (nothing to do with Stack Exchange). I also enjoy my time on other sites, but Movies & TV has a golden throne in my heart.

SE sites did help me in my programming issues and acted as an escape for me in the form of non-programming ones. I did plan to quit SE at least twice, but I ended up de-modding myself rather than leaving. I can't abandon the sites which gave me a lot. They acted like my escape, helped me in programming issues, enriched my knowledge, and also to overcame stress up to an extent. It might sound odd since it's not a social network as such, but I did make a few friends from SE.

But I do acknowledge the issues with SE. Ads do irritate me when I am using it from the office as they can be too bright or weird sometimes. I did feel sad for a moderator on Literature who had to resign due to mistreatment. I also feel this whole thing was handled too clumsily. I do understand the reason for the strike and even signed the lavender letter and might sign the other one too.

So, in short, I opted to stay as I didn't even want to leave. I still have hope in SE, and I do feel they can fix things.

I've been here a couple years but I don't have incredibly high reputation and not as much time sunk into SE. In any case -

• Maybe I'm misreading it, but the mathematics SE seems to not really care about this, in the sense that the activity on the math meta related to this is relatively diminished. I don't go on math.SE to [insert CoC related action], I go there to solve math problems or get help on my own. We'll see how much the CoC can be "weaponised", but I doubt it will affect me in any practical way, as long as I continue to operate with the "Be Nice" policy...
• The outrage hasn't (yet) pushed away the majority of the great contributors. If they move, I'll probably go wherever they go.
• as a non-American: I'm taking this (the stuff about pronouns) as some sort of education about what a large number (though notably not all!) Americans (and maybe Europeans?) are thinking.
• As the outrage and changes don't affect me personally (yet), I'm curious. I'll check again tomorrow because I want to see how the coming events will unfold.

I stay for now because:

• I want what's best for the global community of people seeking knowledge and betterment of the world. (Once upon a time SE corp. had its goals aligned with mine, but we've clearly diverged, and I don't see them going back on the right track in an acceptable time frame, unfortunately.)

• I'm waiting on a better Q&A platform (and gathering information about what it should look like, so I could take part in developing it when it launches) which will:

  • As its primary goal have collection of high quality knowledge in the form that the SE user community values and wants to protect;
  • Never again have financial gain as any of its driving goals, so that it could not interfere with its main goal, as it so unfortunately did in this iteration;
  • Not forget the human like a financially-driven organization with faceless corporate management, but instead act kindly and try to rectify any wrongdoings, like any reasonable person, acquaintance or a neighbour would;
  • Take into account feedback of experienced users who have shown understanding of the knowledge base's processes and can act as a medium between common users and developers;
  • Have staff held at a much higher standard than "at least capable of performing basic duties as described in the job description"; actual professionals with good reputation and experience in the area and the specific field, such as community management;
  • Be much more transparent about its inner workings and development progress;
  • Post frequent public updates on its internal technical, social and legal processes, and change notes, as can be expected from the best of the best software companies;

• By my continued participation I'm trying to bring about a brighter future in form of a better place for myself and others to learn, share and preserve useful knowledge. And I would do the same on the next best platform like this if I can see that a better alternative is not far from coming and in the works.

This might seem like a naive dream to some, but I've seen this site at its better time, and I've seen many great and talented people at their best, so I know this is absolutely achievable. We just have to get there together.

I gained a lot early in life from people freely sharing their knowledge with me. I believe strongly in doing the same for others. I stick around through this in the hope that SE will continue to be an open and free place to share knowledge in a mutually respectful way that trusts community members and moderators to do the right thing.