11

The flag ban system does its calculations using the dates that flags are handled, not when they are cast. When at least 10 flags have been handled in the last 7 days, if more than 25% of those flags are declined, you're not able to cast any flags.

This causes a dire-looking banner to appear above one's flag summary linking to flags "declined in the last 7 days", i.e., those that have caused the ban. Which looked like this in my case, on the 24th of March:

Only one flag listed there, which shouldn't be enough to trigger a ban. This was extremely confusing, and led me to wonder if there was a manual ban that had been applied to me. I can't find any mention of such a feature, though.

There are tooltips on the "results" field of handled flags, showing the resolution date, so I tried counting manually and eventually found that indeed I had 2 other declined flags in the previous 7-day span:


I didn't know until looking into this even further that I can see handled flags by category, ordered by handling date. So I can easily find these two flags, but N.B. that the spam flag that triggered the ban is not listed with them, which are categorized separately under "post flags". There's no filter view that shows me these three together.

This is confusing and frustrating,* but easily fixable. The link that tells me it's showing me flags "declined in the last 7 days", which is what I need to know, should just show exactly what it says.

Right now it appears to display flags cast in the last 7 days, that were declined. Not the same thing, much less useful, and importantly, not its apparent intention (thus I've tagged this as a "bug").


*With 54 flags declined of 2,708 cast, I tend to think of myself as generally being useful when flagging, and I couldn't really understand why my flags were suddenly deemed not so.

1
  • 3
    As an editorial aside, getting flag banned because of the coincidence of only three flags cast over the course of a month being declined within a week of each other is, to put it mildly, discouraging. I would strongly urge consideration of the MSE question I linked about tweaking the calculation, or something like it.
    – jscs
    Commented Mar 27, 2016 at 21:01

1 Answer 1

6

Yep, the query for declined flags contributing to a flag ban was using the flag creation date instead of the flag decline date.

I've updated that query to use the correct date - this will be with you in the next build (meta rev 2016.3.31.4335, other sites: rev 2016.3.31.3411).

1
  • 3
    Well, I hope I never have to see it again, but thanks for fixing it!
    – jscs
    Commented Mar 31, 2016 at 17:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .