I think we have a real issue with Moderators closing/removing issues as "Not Constructive", etc., even if they are clearly valued by the market or community.
This has been bothering me for a while, but this morning was the straw that broke the camel's back. I came onto StackOverflow and discovered that a question that I asked several years ago, had received 18 up-votes, and which earned me "Famous Question", had been removed (see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77839/what-are-the-best-resources-for-learning-java-books-websites-etc).
Clearly, this question had valued as testified to by the number of views and the up-votes it received. Yet, our moderators substituted their opinion of the question's value for that of the community.
I acknowledge and value the role that moderation plays in making StackOverflow a fantastic and valuable resource. At the same time, I believe when we serve a moderators, we need to inform our decisions and actions by the value the community has put on things.
Should this be automated (i.e. a question with 10K Views can't be removed) or should this be a practice?
On a related note, when a question is pulled, shouldn't there be more feedback on why it was pulled then the message I received?
Valuable or not, this question doesn't have a clear and concise answer and can lead to discussion. Some people prefer books, other websites, others in person training. What's effective for one person isn't effective for others. The FAQ for StackOverflow is clear about what type of questions are acceptable on this community. My wife really values questions about knitting, but those are not acceptable here either. A good stackoverflow question will have one definitive answer.
deleted by Mark, ACB, LittleBobbyTables, John Saunders, Andrew Barber
. No moderators were involved in the deletion of this question, just qualified members of the community.