Prompted over the weekend, I posted an example of one of the only questions I think is a warranted use of community wiki. Look it over and understand it - a general FAQ, not a replacement for more specific questions (Apple's problem as mentioned on the aforementioned blog post). It actually has community contributions to shape its answer. And it is, of course, a valuable question.
Provided that the question and answers remain on-topic and valuable, is CW still useful in cases where no answer is (or can be) "better" and "more correct" than another?
No. I even put a specific point in there to address this, and the example from Gaming helps illustrate this. That said, be careful not to overgeneralize when looking at the essence of a question. The examples you've provided have some of their own issues, which we'll look at in a bit.
Should moderators actively set CW on such questions, or should the system be the only entity allowed to do so?
If "such questions" refers to the above scenario, then no, again. If by "such questions", you mean questions where it is appropriate to use community wiki (which is rare), then we are given this exception handling tool for exactly that - exception handling. So, on to that point...
I'm not sure how to decide this, and not sure whether CW should be actively applied.
Parenting is a bit of a different case, not unlike Programmers in which their questions are intended very much to dance on the line of "subjectivity". But remember, subjectivity is not our enemy, not unlike how community wiki isn't something to be loathed. It's abuse of both that is what to be loathed.
Your example questions, are polls, not questions, and even for a subjective site, that's not all that useful. A more pertinent blog post for this is Real Questions Have Answers, which can be applied even to a subjective site. Looking at the bedtime ritual post, it's simply a survey of an item per post. I cannot look at any single answer and say "This is a solution". They are all parts of a solution.
The point of community wiki isn't for a bunch of people to contribute one-line points as separate answers - that's rather the opposite. You want the conglomeration, the full package, to occupy a single post. If it's scattered in several posts, that's where your voting and paging and all that is hurting you. Questions should be having answers, not "the answer is the combination of all the responses here". That is the difference between "What software exists to record my gameplay" (all answers are "equally valid", the "solution" is the set of answers) and "How do I record videos of my gameplay?" (any individual software is a solution).
When it comes to questions with multiple possible answers, I recommend this rather old but still valid post I wrote for Gaming Meta. Pay special notice to the fact that community wiki isn't so much as mentioned in that post.