I proposed one action (which I drastically edited in response to comments) that was not favorably received. I am now editing again, in response to further comments. I think I have adequately addressed the close-reasons, and request that this Q be reopened.
There continues to be protest at SE's reprehensible act and on the proposed new processes, but it is becoming clearer that Monica will be forced to apply for reinstatement via the new policy when she was ousted -- ousted without going through any policy at all.
We see some response from SE in the form of processes and FAQs, but the mountains of questions, answers, comments specifically about Monica are sliding off SE like they are written in an ancient Vulcan dialect. It's not just privacy concerns, because Monica herself says that SE has not responded to her questions.
Moreover, I sense that the volume of protest from users is tailing off. Understandable, because everything that can be said based on actions so far has been said, five or six times.
So, does anyone have any suggestions to keep Monica, specifically, in center place in SE's consciousness? I'm not talking about escalation or usurping Monica's prerogative to take whatever next step she feels serves her purpose (as a couple of comments assumed), but making sure that SE is aware that we still care as much as we did when this whole mess started.
One possibility: Change your user name to: oldusername ReinstateMonicaNow, or some such variant. This preserves your identity, lets people know who you are and keeps SE on the hook (as much as we can).