We've had a mixture of varying statements with regards to events leading to the removal of Monica Celio as a moderator.
A statement and apology by SE does not match previous statements by moderators, and one moderator has called for SE to stop lying.
A call to make the relevant chat log public has received an objection from at least one person directly involved, so it's unlikely that's ever going to happen.
I'd really like an account of what happened I can trust, without one of the parties disputing it. To be short, I want the truth!
Could the relevant parties (Stack Exchange and the moderator team at the time of the event, ideally including Monica Celio) draft a shared public statement, so we can have agreement on what actually happened between the parties involved?
Or, is there another way we can resolve these conflicting statements and get to the truth without violating the confidentiality of the parties involved?