Timeline for Don't remove the @ part of my comment
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
52 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2021 at 8:09 | answer | added | Federico Poloni | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Jun 17, 2021 at 21:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 17, 2021 at 21:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 9, 2021 at 19:32 | history | bounty started | samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz | ||
| S Jun 9, 2021 at 19:32 | history | notice added | samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz | Draw attention | |
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 6, 2015 at 12:56 | comment | added | Arjan |
And over 4 years after the implementation, it seems even SE developers are still confused. Like “Comments should be at least 15 characters in length” does not make clear @name might be excluded shows that a developer made the Android app automatically add the @name part when replying to a comment, after which the same thing is silently ignored when counting the comment length.
|
|
| S Sep 6, 2015 at 12:43 | history | bounty ended | Arjan | ||
| S Sep 6, 2015 at 12:43 | history | notice removed | Arjan | ||
| S Aug 30, 2015 at 13:46 | history | bounty started | Arjan | ||
| S Aug 30, 2015 at 13:46 | history | notice added | Arjan | Current answers are outdated | |
| Jun 20, 2015 at 4:57 | comment | added | Mark Ransom | Thanks for bounty. I wonder if there's a way to re-open this now that Jeff is long gone? | |
| S Jun 20, 2015 at 0:27 | history | bounty ended | T.J. Crowder | ||
| S Jun 20, 2015 at 0:27 | history | notice removed | T.J. Crowder | ||
| Jun 13, 2015 at 23:41 | answer | added | Reg Edit | timeline score: 5 | |
| S Jun 13, 2015 at 22:50 | history | bounty started | T.J. Crowder | ||
| S Jun 13, 2015 at 22:50 | history | notice added | T.J. Crowder | Draw attention | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| S Sep 12, 2013 at 15:02 | history | suggested | user000001 |
Added tag comments, after a loooong search for this post
|
|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 14:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 12, 2013 at 15:02 | |||||
| Jun 25, 2012 at 6:00 | answer | added | Arjan | timeline score: 28 | |
| Aug 23, 2011 at 2:33 | history | edited | Brad Mace | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
new tag plus some spelling and sentence breaks
|
| Jul 22, 2011 at 5:51 | answer | added | Benjol | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 22, 2011 at 0:50 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Used the official names of Stack Overflow -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, "Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name".
|
| Jul 21, 2011 at 14:07 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 319 characters in body
|
| Jul 21, 2011 at 13:51 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
gather together the pros and cons, point to the constructive solution
|
| Jul 13, 2011 at 21:32 | comment | added | T.J. Crowder |
@Shadow: True. But while in the early days what Jeff thought should almost certainly have been law -- that's how you establish something, with a clear vision and strong guidance -- three years later, if the claim is that "the community runs it," it's time to let the community do exactly that. This kind of micro-management can very well kill the SE network. It's grown beyond one man's vision, and it needs to. And again, if you're going to flaunt the community, pick something worthwhile. One @ is not remotely worthwhile.
|
|
| Jul 13, 2011 at 21:27 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Good point @T.J. but still my points stands and the problem is that Jeff consider every non vital word in question, answer or comment as "noise" and we can't really change the way he thinks. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 21:15 | comment | added | T.J. Crowder | @Shadow, @Popular: The envelope thing was a botched enhancement and total UX failure that was then corrected. Correcting it makes up for everything. The system we have now is a good one; for a short time, we had something that was screwed up, but it didn't last. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 20:55 | comment | added | Pops | @Shadow, yeah, I'm not hopeful for this one either, but I thought it was worth pointing out since you used the word "impossible." | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 20:05 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Popular I doubt this one will become one of these.. the cases I saw are new ideas here we're talking about restoring previous behavior. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 19:23 | comment | added | Pops | @Shadow, there have been instances in the past of declined posts turning into completed posts. | |
| Jul 10, 2011 at 10:54 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Well done for trying and picking up the glove but as was the case with the envelope R.I.P (where many members wanted it restored) changing decision of the Developers once such a decision was made is impossible. | |
| Jul 10, 2011 at 2:04 | comment | added | Some Helpful Commenter | #T.J. I say we should just use # for addressing the poster | |
| Jul 9, 2011 at 15:54 | answer | added | T.J. Crowder | timeline score: 40 | |
| Jul 9, 2011 at 8:53 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2144 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2011 at 23:38 | answer | added | Pete L. Clark | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jul 8, 2011 at 17:54 | answer | added | Mark Ransom | timeline score: 50 | |
| Jul 8, 2011 at 16:34 | answer | added | Jason S | timeline score: 77 | |
| Jul 4, 2011 at 17:51 | answer | added | JockM | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 3, 2011 at 16:49 | history | edited | Jon Seigel |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 3, 2011 at 8:58 | answer | added | Jan Fabry | timeline score: 125 | |
| Jul 3, 2011 at 0:12 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: -72 | |
| Jul 3, 2011 at 0:08 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 2, 2011 at 23:55 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 380 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2011 at 23:35 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2011 at 23:29 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1312 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2011 at 23:24 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1312 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2011 at 23:00 | history | edited | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 173 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2011 at 22:46 | answer | added | pavium | timeline score: -16 | |
| Jul 2, 2011 at 22:44 | history | asked | T.J. Crowder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |