Timeline for What are the “spam” and “rude or abusive” (offensive) flags, and how do they work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2018 at 6:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 5, 2018 at 7:24 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2018 at 4:06 | history | rollback | iBug says Reinstate Monica |
Rollback to Revision 10
|
|
| Jan 9, 2018 at 4:05 | history | edited | iBug says Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
.
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 4, 2016 at 7:29 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Consistent formatting, more general flag-removal question (to match the answer)
|
| Jul 31, 2016 at 12:36 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
the “offensive” flag has been renamed to “rude or abusive”
|
| Apr 1, 2015 at 2:03 | comment | added | PeterX | I couldn't see the flag - at bottom of post - for marking an answer as (real) spam. I realised I needed to be logged-in to the site (i.e. in this case refresh my browser). | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Aug 20, 2013 at 18:09 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Combining them, as a lot of the information is the exact same.
|
| Aug 30, 2012 at 15:24 | history | edited | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Aug 27, 2012 at 19:58 | vote | accept | Kip | ||
| Aug 27, 2012 at 18:24 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body; edited title
|
| Aug 24, 2012 at 15:21 | comment | added | Lee Louviere | @RobertHarvey Ok, but for reference I posted an answer with my findings. Hopefully if anyone else has the question in their head, it'll clear it up. It's basically the consensus from other questions. | |
| Aug 24, 2012 at 15:07 | comment | added | user102937 | @Xaade: The scenario that you are describing is exceptionally rare, and if it does happen, moderators can reverse it. | |
| Aug 24, 2012 at 15:03 | answer | added | Lee Louviere | timeline score: 63 | |
| Aug 23, 2012 at 21:59 | comment | added | Lee Louviere | I meant to focus that comment more on malicious editors could cause misdirected rep damage since the first revision owner gets the damage. | |
| Aug 23, 2012 at 21:45 | comment | added | Lee Louviere | Looking at the answer. I see that the first revision owner loses the rep? What happens if a bunch of people vote spam on an edit? If it's one or two votes, the OP or editor can rollback and remove the flag, but if it's 6, the original revision owner (the OP) loses rep? What if the Spam is a malicious edit. Shouldn't the flagged revision owner lose rep instead? | |
| Jun 13, 2011 at 16:28 | history | protected | user1228 | ||
| Jun 13, 2011 at 16:26 | history | edited | user1228 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 14:28 | answer | added | Kip | timeline score: 257 | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 14:22 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Kip | ||
| Jul 22, 2010 at 14:12 | history | asked | Kip | CC BY-SA 2.5 |