Skip to main content

All Questions

3 votes
1 answer
128 views

Can we see quantifier elimination by comparing semirings?

This question came up while reading the paper Hales, What is motivic measure?. Broadly speaking, I'm interested in which ideas from motivic measure make sense in arbitrary first-order theories (or ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
299 views

Chevalley's theorem on valuation spectra

In the paper On Valuation Spectra (Section 2, Page 176), Huber and Knebusch asserted that: if the ring map $A\to B$ is finitely presented then the associated map of valuation spectra $\mathrm{Spv}(B)\...
Johnny's user avatar
  • 255
1 vote
0 answers
206 views

Interpretation of model theory in algebraic geometry

I found a paper Some applications of a model theoretic fact to (semi-) algebraic geometry by Lou van den Dries. In this paper, the author uses model theoretical methods to prove the completeness of ...
George's user avatar
  • 227
5 votes
1 answer
479 views

General algebraic result obtained from consideration on $\mathbb{Q}_p$

There are results in field theory which are obtained from, let's say, the complex numbers and then generalized to all algebraically closed fields. For instance, the fact that a polynomial $P$ admits a ...
Weier's user avatar
  • 231
6 votes
1 answer
363 views

Interpreting group-theoretic sentences as statements about algebraic groups

Suppose we are given a sentence in the language of groups, e.g. $\phi=\forall x\forall y(x\cdot y=y\cdot x)$, and suppose that we are also given the data defining an algebraic group $G/k$. One can ...
Nathan Lowry's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
208 views

Minor Lefschetz principle

I once read (I think) the following equivalent formulation of the Minor Lefschetz principle: If an elementary sentence holds for one algebraically closed field, then it holds for every algebraically ...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,503
9 votes
1 answer
734 views

Is a complex algebraic set with a Zariski dense subset of algebraic points already defined over the algebraic numbers?

This is a cross-post! For the original post on SE (9 upvotes, no answer) see: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4475853/is-a-complex-algebraic-set-with-a-zariski-dense-subset-of-algebraic-...
Luvath's user avatar
  • 145
5 votes
1 answer
382 views

Does the main theorem of elimination theory with $\mathbb{Z}$-coefficients imply that projective varieties are complete?

I have a question concerning the completeness of projective varieties. Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. By the "main theorem of elimination theory" I mean the following result: Let $...
Luvath's user avatar
  • 145
7 votes
1 answer
488 views

Is there any theory of "étale cohomology" with algebraic coefficients?

For simplicity, I will restrict attention to untwisted coefficients. Let $k$ be a finite field of characteristic $p$, and $\ell\ne p$ prime. Can one define a cohomology theory with $\mathbb{Q}_\ell^{\...
Curious's user avatar
  • 341
2 votes
1 answer
237 views

Example of a bounded imperfect PAC field that is not separably closed

How do you construct a bounded (meaning there are only finitely many separable finite extensions of any given degree) imperfect pseudo-algebraically closed field that is not separably closed? I assume ...
Florian Felix's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
646 views

Tarski's original proof of quantifier elimination in algebraically closed fields

I am currently helping teach a course about foundations of mathematics, which has thus far focused mostly on propositional and first-order logic. As part of the course, the students are each required ...
Martin Skilleter's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
213 views

Comparing the first-order theories of different kinds of local rings of a complex variety

Let $X$ be a complex variety containing some point $x$. Then $X$ is naturally a complex-analytic space, and we have an inclusion of rings $\mathbb{C}[X]_x\hookrightarrow\mathbb{C}\{X\}_x\...
Doron Grossman-Naples's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
186 views

Issue with "definition" of pseudo algebraically closed fields

I'm having an issue with a sentence in Chapter 11 of Fried & Jarden's Field Arithmetic. As a "motto" for pseudo algebraically closed (PAC) fields, they say they are fields $K$ such that &...
user221330's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
275 views

Algebraic geometry additionally equipped with field automorphism operation

I am looking for some facts on theory, which is essentially algebraic geometry but with field automorphisms added as 'basic' operations. (Precisely, I mean universal algebraic geometry for (universal) ...
JSch's user avatar
  • 63
4 votes
1 answer
247 views

What is the definable functor associated to an algebraic scheme (model theory of valued fields)

I have a very basic question regarding algebraic model theory. I am trying to read Espaces de Berkovich, polytopes, squelettes et théorie des modèles (MSN) by Antoine Ducros. The relevant section is ...
Jakob Werner's user avatar
  • 1,133

15 30 50 per page