Skip to main content

Questions tagged [lo.logic]

first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.

10 votes
1 answer
841 views

What gets to be called a "proper class?"

ZFC has no formal notion of "proper class," but informally, everyone uses the term anyway. $V$, $Ord$, etc are said to be proper classes. Similarly, although in ZFC, one can only take the &...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
238 views

Open problems in complete theories

It is well-known that every complete recursively enumerable first-order theory is decidable. Does that mean that such theories are "trivial", or are there still interesting open problems ...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
43 views

Chromatic number of the dual hypergraph [duplicate]

Let $H = (V,E)$ be a hypergraph. For $v\in V$ we set $E_v = \{e\in E: v\in E\}$. The dual of $H$ is defined by $H^* =(E, V^*)$ is, where $V^* = \{E_v:v\in V\}$. If $\kappa>0$ is a cardinal, a map $...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
239 views

Axiomatic strength of the cumulative hierarchy

In the 2021 paper Level Theory Part I: Axiomatizing the Bare Idea of a Cumulative Hierarchy of Sets by Tim Button, a first order theory of the cumulative hierarchy is explored. Initially no axioms ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,189
12 votes
2 answers
979 views

Proof/Reference to a claim about AC and definable real numbers

I’ve read somewhere on this site (I believe from a JDH comment) that an argument in favor of AC (I believe from Asaf Karagila) is that without AC, there exists a real number which is not definable ...
Lave Cave's user avatar
  • 223
13 votes
4 answers
761 views

What is a "general" relation algebra?

I'm trying to understand why (or if) the axioms of relation algebras are "the right ones." For example, we can back up the idea that the group axioms exactly capture the notion of "...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
15 votes
2 answers
804 views

Which are the hereditarily computably enumerable sets?

My question is about sets that are computably enumerable with respect to their hereditary membership structure. Specifically, let me define that a hereditarily computably enumerable (h.c.e.) set is ...
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
131 views

Is the Tarski–Seidenberg theorem constructively provable?

The Tarski–Seidenberg theorem asserts that the projection of a semialgebraic set is also a semialgebraic set. My question is whether this is provable in constructive mathematics. First, let me ...
Christopher King's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
134 views

Closed sets versus closed sublocales in general topology in constructive math

This question is set in constructive mathematics (without Choice), such as in the internal logic of a topos with natural numbers object, or in IZF. Short version of the question: if $X$ is a sober ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 30.7k
10 votes
1 answer
600 views

Infinitary logics and the axiom of choice

Suppose we want to enhance ZF by allowing for infinitary formulas instead of just first-order ones in our axiom schema of separation and/or replacement. It seems that we don't need much power in our ...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
163 views

Examples of Grothendieck ($\infty$-)topoi which do / do not satisfy the law of excluded middle

I would like to create a big list of Grothendieck topoi (or Grothendieck $\infty$-topoi) which do / do not satisfy the law of excluded middle. That is, let’s list some examples of topoi whose internal ...
-1 votes
0 answers
94 views

Is it consistent to have comprehension with mere restriction of $\in$ to occur with a parameter?

Language: mono-sorted first order logic with equality, with the extra-logical primitive $\in$, and axioms: Extensionality: as in ZF Define: $\operatorname {set}(x) \iff \exists y: x \in y$ ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
40 views

Is the class of strongly Kripke complete normal modal logics closed under sums?

Given an arbitrary set of normal modal logics $\mathcal{L}$, one can define their sum $\bigoplus \mathcal{L}$ (or $\bigoplus_{L \in \mathcal{L}} L$ if you prefer) to be the least normal modal logic ...
beehive's user avatar
  • 21
3 votes
1 answer
121 views

Is existence of this function on nonempty sets of Quine atoms consistent with ZF-Regularity?

Working in $\sf ZF \text { - Regularity}$ Let $A $ be the set of all Quine atoms. Let $f$ be a partial injective function from $\mathcal P(A)\setminus \{\emptyset\}$ to $A$. Lets postulate the ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
124 views

Inevitable consistency strength, take 2

This is an attempt to repair this old question of mine. Say that a good candidate is a first-order sentence $\varphi$ in a language $\{<,...\}$ containing a distinguished binary relation symbol $&...
Noah Schweber's user avatar

15 30 50 per page