Skip to main content

Questions tagged [lo.logic]

first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.

1 vote
0 answers
43 views

Are "equi-expressivity" relations always congruences on Post's lattice?

Given a clone $\mathcal{C}$ over the set $\{\top,\perp\}$, let $\mathsf{FOL}^\mathcal{C}$ be the version of first-order logic with (symbols corresponding to) elements of $\mathcal{C}$ replacing the ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
292 views

Negating fundamental axioms

It is commonplace to consider standard axiomatic systems (e.g. $ZF$) with one of the 'less essential' axioms negated, like infinity, 'less essential' here having some ambiguous definition related to ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,229
-3 votes
1 answer
216 views

Two equivalent statements about formulas projected onto an Ultrafilter

Question 1: In the same language, let $ X $ be a nonempty set, and let $ \{ (\forall x_{x(i)} f(i)) \ | \ i \in X \} $ be a set of formulas. We use $ x(i) $ to denote the index of the variable on ...
Stanley sun's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
72 views

Whence compactness of automorphism quantifiers?

The following question arose while trying to read Shelah's papers Models with second-order properties I-V. For simplicity, I'm assuming a much stronger theory here than Shelah: throughout, we work in $...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
70 views

Is there a substructure-preservation result for FOL in finite model theory?

It's well-known$^*$ that the Los-Tarski theorem ("Every substructure-preserved sentence is equivalent to a $\forall^*$-sentence") fails for $\mathsf{FOL}$ in the finite setting: we can find ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
219 views

Equivalence of omniscience principles for natural numbers and analytic omniscience principles for Cauchy real numbers

In constructive mathematics, a proposition $P$ is decidable if $P \vee \neg P$, and a proposition is stable if $\neg \neg P \implies P$. We have the following principles of omniscience for the natural ...
Madeleine Birchfield's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
221 views

About having one axiom schema for ZFC motivated after the iterative conception of sets?

This posting is related to this posting, and builds its motivation from this answer to it. Define: $\operatorname {History}(x) \iff \\\forall y \in x: y=\{c \mid \exists z : z \in y \cap x \land (c \...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
69 views

Defining fields of characteristic zero in existential second-order logic

Is it possible to define in existential second-order logic (ESO) the class of fields of characteristic zero? An easy compactness argument shows that the class of fields of positive characteristic is ...
Reijo Jaakkola's user avatar
-1 votes
2 answers
237 views

Heuristic interpretations of the PA-unprovability of Goodstein's Theorem

I've relatively recently learned about Goodstein's Theorem and its unprovability in Peano arithmetic (the Kirby-Paris Theorem). I do not have any real knowledge of formal logic; but I think I've seen ...
Julian Newman's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
168 views

Completing half of Hilbert's program: Foundations that are conservative over Peano Arithmetic

The goal of the Hilbert program was to find a complete and consistent formalization of mathematics. Gödel's first incompleteness theorem establishes that completeness is impossible with first-order ...
Christopher King's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
118 views

What determines non-finite axiomatizability of a class extension of a set theory?

Suppose $T$ is a set theory, i.e. doesn't have proper classes. And $T$ can interpret $\sf PA$, and $T$ is an effectively generated consistent first order set theory. Now, let $T^+$ be a class theory ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
658 views

Which part(s) of this proof of Goodstein's Theorem are not expressible in Peano arithmetic?

EDIT: Noah Schweber helpfully points out that $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ is a conservative extension of Peano arithmetic in which certain aspects of my proof not expressible in Peano arithmetic are expressible. ...
Julian Newman's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
131 views

Algebraic structures on spaces of ultrafilters

The space of ultrafilters on $\omega$ has a natural semigroup structure, and ultrafilters that are idempotent in that algebra have seen applications in combinatorics on the natural numbers, for ...
Monroe Eskew's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
260 views

Intuition for the "internal logic" of a cotopos

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be an elementary topos. By definition, $\mathcal{E}$ is a category that has finite limits, is Cartesian closed, and has a subobject classifier $\Omega$. This subobject classifier can ...
safsom's user avatar
  • 173
5 votes
0 answers
89 views

Computational view of subsystems of second-order arithmetic

If System T "corresponds" to full first-order arithmetic, and System F (λ2) corresponds to full second-order arithmetic, what type systems would be associated with weaker fragments, ...
user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
351