Let's say we're running a basic algebra course and we're committed to showing proofs of everything we reasonably can. The development of equations of lines seems most straightforward in this sequence: (1) the standard (defining) formula $Ax + By = C$, (2) the definition of slope $m = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1}$, (3) the point-slope formula $y - y_1 = m(x - x_1)$, and then (4) the slope-intercept formula $y = mx + b$. That is: the definition in (2) after a few steps of manipulation leads to (3), which itself after a few steps of manipulation leads to (4).
However, if we consider presenting things in this sequence, there seems to be a dearth of interesting exercises we can assign at the point when we have formula (3) but not (4). We could just give a point and a slope and ask students to substitute them, but that is trivial/uninteresting. The half-dozen textbooks I've surveyed only ever use formula (3) as part of exercises (say, starting from two points) that ultimately lead to expressing the answer in the form of (4).
So: Are there any interesting (partially challenging, enlightening) exercises that make use of the point-slope form (3) without any reference or use of the slope-intercept form (4)? If not, then I suppose I should just present both formulas immediately together and then proceed to those exercises that convert from one to the other.
As a negative example, consider a sample exercise set from OpenStax College Algebra (Section 2.2). "For the following exercises, find the equation of the line using the point-slope formula. Write all the final equations using the slope-intercept form." (Various point-slopes and pairs of points are given.) That's not useful in our present case because we're at a moment when slope-intercept is not available. Likewise, the goal of this question is not to find applications or problem-solving uses (which are, somewhat embarrassingly, not part of the curriculum in question), but rather to directly exercise writing and manipulating the point-slope formula itself algebraically.