Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
2 answers
2k views

Proving equivalency using boolean algebra laws of logic

I have a question on my exam papers relating to proving equivalences using the laws of logic, but I'm not sure how to work it out as I don't have the solution paper. Can someone explain to me the ...
Brian Var's user avatar
  • 121
1 vote
3 answers
159 views

Propositional Logic : Why is ((p $\Rightarrow$ r) $\land$ (q $\Rightarrow$ r)) $\equiv$ ((p $\lor$ q) $\Rightarrow$ r)

I was working my way through some Propositional Logic and had the following doubt : Why is this true : ((p $\Rightarrow$ r) $\land$ (q $\Rightarrow$ r)) $\equiv$ ((p $\lor$ q) $\Rightarrow$ r) ...
pranav's user avatar
  • 1,503
2 votes
2 answers
2k views

DNF Form of XOR Operator with N Arguments

I’m working on this problem: Explain how to express $p$ using the boolean connectives AND, OR, and NOT so that the resulting expression has length polynomial in $n$. $$p(x_1\cdots x_n) = x_1 \oplus ...
Dori's user avatar
  • 21
2 votes
3 answers
76 views

How to show that if $\neg b = a \land d$ then $a \land \neg b = \neg b$ and $b \land \neg a = \neg a$

I'm new to boolean algebra and am having trouble proving the following simple theorem. Many thanks for any help. If $\neg b = a \land d$ then $a \land \neg b = \neg b$ and $b \land \neg a = \neg a$. ...
user1200428's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
2k views

Is infinite boolean algebra atomless?

I got two questions: 1) Does there exist an infinite Boolean algebra which contains an atom? I answered yes. 2) Does there exist an infinite Boolean algebra B such that for every b contained in B ...
Blackgirl5's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
2k views

Finding the atoms and elements of a Lindenbaum–Tarski algebra

Let B be the Lindenbaum–Tarski algebra with three variables $p,q,r$ (1) Find all the atoms of $B$. (2) How many elements of does $B$ have? So I think I know what an atom is, but I'm still not sure ...
User38's user avatar
  • 575
7 votes
5 answers
6k views

Difficulty understanding why $ P \implies Q$ is equivalent to P only if Q.

I have difficulties understanding why $ P \implies Q$ is equivalent to P only if Q. I do understand that in the statement "P only if Q", it means if $ \lnot Q \implies \lnot P$". Regarding this ...
Faizal Ismaeel's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
1k views

Simplification of boolean expression with xor

I need to simplify the following boolean expression ¬(A xor B) xor (B + ¬C) I know A xor B = ¬AB + A¬B Then the expression will become ¬(¬AB + A¬B) xor (B + ¬C) However, I stuck on it and I don't know ...
user2185071's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
2k views

How would I go from DNF to a simplified formula with less symbols?

Here's a DNF: $$(\neg A_1 \land \neg A_2 \land \neg A_3 ) \lor (A_1 \land \neg A_2 \land \neg A_3 ) \lor (\neg A_1 \land \neg A_2 \land A_3 ) \lor (\neg A_1 \land A_2 \land \neg A_3 )$$ And the ...
Steady's user avatar
  • 37
2 votes
4 answers
12k views

Show that (P→Q) ∧ (Q→R) is equivalent to (P→R) ∧ [(P↔Q) ∨ (R↔Q)]

I literally have no idea how to start this proof. I get to (P→Q) ∧ (Q→R) = (¬P ∨ Q) ∧ (¬Q ∨ R) and then I get stuck.
lsaf1021's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
78 views

Going from (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ q) to (p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∨~q)

I am confused on how to go from (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ q) to (p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q). I know they are equal because I plugged them into a truth table and all of the rows have the same values. What would be some ...
daMainMathHomie's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
256 views

AND using XOR and OR?

Is there a way to make an AND using only XOR and OR. I know that a XOR b = ab'+ba' but I have no idea how to proceed.
Vector_13's user avatar
  • 626
2 votes
3 answers
531 views

Construct XNOR with only OR gates

Is it possible to construct the XNOR gate which is given as, a XNOR b = (a AND b) OR (~a AND ~b), by using only OR gates. So from the definition, the question boils down to: can you construct the AND ...
Jon Feingold's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
117 views

Prove if Tautology, Contradicton, or Neither. Is my proof ok?

Determine whether $((p \Rightarrow q) \Rightarrow r) \Leftrightarrow (p \Rightarrow (q \Rightarrow r))$ is a tautology, a contradiction, or neither. If $p,q,r = (0,0,0)$ then $((p \Rightarrow q)\...
JayS's user avatar
  • 75
1 vote
1 answer
1k views

Alternative to xor(A,B,C)

How can we make a comprehensive statement, which will correspond to the truth table of xor (A, B, C) by combining logical operators AND (&), OR (|), XOR (xor) and NOT (!)? In other words, the ...
Markus's user avatar
  • 11

15 30 50 per page