Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
0 answers
31 views

Form of the divisors of a number (Prime Factorization). Is this algorithm-based proof correct? [duplicate]

I am trying to proof the following result: For a number $n$ whose prime number decomposition is $p_1^{\alpha _1} ... p_m^{\alpha _m}$. Every divisor of $n$ has the form $p_1^{\beta _1} ... p_m^{\beta ...
niobium's user avatar
  • 1,231
1 vote
0 answers
63 views

Proof for at least $n$ different prime factors in $2^{2^n}+2^{2^{n-1}}+1$ if $n$ is a natural number

I am stuck on this proof and I need assistance please. Not sure if it's the right start but here is what I've done so far: I let $x=2^{n-1}$ and $2x=2^x$ that will change the expression to $2^{2x}+2^x+...
Oli's user avatar
  • 11
3 votes
0 answers
45 views

Transforming an existing proof to a slightly different question.

Here is the original question: Natural numbers $n$, $k$ are given such that for any prime $p$ there exists an integer $a$ satisfying the condition $p\mid a^k-n$. Decide whether $n$ must necessarily ...
Tomáš Macháček's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
171 views

Application of Unique Factorisation Theorem in Proof

CONTEXT: Proof question made up by uni math lecturer Suppose you have $x+y=2z$ (where $x$ and $y$ are consecutive odd primes) for some integer $z>1$, and that you need to prove that $x+y$ has at ...
Ruby Pa's user avatar
  • 359
1 vote
2 answers
58 views

How can I solve this proof? (Prime factorization)

Let $p_1, p_2, ... , p_n$ be $n$ distinct primes. Prove that for all $x ∈ \Bbb{Z}$ we have $ p_i | x $ for all $i ∈ \{1,2, ... , n\}$ if and only if $(p_1*p_2* ...*p_n)|x$. Hello. I'm very lost in ...
somber_singularity's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
114 views

If 13 does not divide m, then prove that $m^4+8$ is not a cube of an integer [closed]

My question is how can we prove that $m^4 + 8$ not a cube of an integer if $m$ can not be divided by 13. What I have done so far: By Fermat’s Little Theorem: \begin{align} m^{p-1} &\equiv 1 \...
Singh Chief's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
351 views

Proof using prime factorization and fundamental theorem of arithmetic

Let $x$ and $y$ be positive integers such that $7x^5 = 11y^{13}$. The minimum value of $x$ can be written in the form $a^cb^d$, where $a, b, c, d$ are positive integers. Compute $a + b + c + d$. What ...
Keith Axelrod's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
53 views

Proof by induction without a closed form

I need to do a proof by induction without the use of a closed form (I do know it's possible to find one, but we aren't supposed to do it that way). Here's the prompt: Let $p_1, p_2, p_3, \ldots, ...
BabaSvoloch's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
8k views

Prove that if $p$ and $p^2+2$ are prime then $p^3+2$ is prime too [duplicate]

I'm trying to figure out how to prove that if $p$ and $p^2+2$ are prime numbers then $p^3+2$ is a prime number too. Can someone help me please?
Ergo's user avatar
  • 501
1 vote
3 answers
227 views

Proving that $p_1p_2\mid n$ iff $p_1\mid n$ and $ p_2\mid n.$

Let $p_1$, $p_2$ be distinct primes. Using the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic prove that a natural number $n$ is divisible by $p_1p_2$ if and only if $n$ is divisible by $p_1$ and $n$ is divisible ...
JOX's user avatar
  • 1,509
0 votes
2 answers
389 views

A New, Possible Proof of the Infinitude of the Primes?

$$1=1$$ $$2=2$$ $$3=3$$ $4=2\cdot2$ At $4$, the first prime number, $2$, is there as a factor. So I say that at the square of $2$, $2$ comes into play as a prime factor. At this point, $2$ is the ...
Jeffrey Young's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
470 views

Is my conjecture true? : Every primorial is a superior highly regular number, and every superior highly regular number is a primorial.

I have invented two sets of positive integers: highly regular numbers and superior highly regular numbers. A positive integer $m \leq n$ is a regular of the positive integer $n$ if all prime numbers ...
Omega Force's user avatar