Skip to main content

All Questions

2 votes
0 answers
26 views

Conservative idempotent magma - proof attempt

I need help with checking proof about idempotent and conservative magmas. Let magma be any ordered pair $(M, \odot)$, where $M$ is nonempty set and $\odot$ binary operation on $M$. Now I need to ...
Oliver Bukovianský's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
20 views

Maximal Extension Chain of Halfgroupoids

A book I am reading gives the following definitions: A collection $\{L_i:i=0,1,2,...\}$ of halfgroupoids $L_i$ is called an extension chain if $L_{i+1}$ is an extension of $L_i$ for each $i$. If $G$ ...
shea's user avatar
  • 31
0 votes
0 answers
34 views

Closest Equivalent to Cayley Graphs for Partial Groupoids?

[A partial groupoid (half-magma) is a set S equipped with a (single-valued) partial binary operation, as in Bruck's Survey of Binary Systems.] This question may be nonsensical, given that the duality ...
shea's user avatar
  • 31
1 vote
0 answers
78 views

non-commutative algebraic structure with 16 elements, need help categorizing it and finding a representation

We have an abstract algebraic structure with the following multiplication table, has anyone seen this structure before and can anyone give it a proper name and a simple (possibly matrix) ...
misanek123's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
118 views

if $\cdot$ and $\odot$ are associative operations on $\mathbb{Z}$ when is the sum $(\cdot + \odot)$ associative?

Where $a(\cdot + \odot)b$ is defined as $(a\cdot b) + (a\odot b)$. I know if $\cdot$ and $\odot$ distribute through addition (i.e. $a\cdot(b+c)=a\cdot b+ a\cdot c$) then the sum $(\cdot + \odot)$ is ...
Mars's user avatar
  • 822
7 votes
2 answers
466 views

If not associative, then what?

Consider a binary operation $*$ acting from a set $X$ to itself. It's useful and standard to work with operations which are associative, such that $(a*b)*c = a*(b*c)$. What about operations which are ...
Jojo's user avatar
  • 1,324
2 votes
1 answer
238 views

Fill in a partly filled in table such that it makes the magma $(M,*)$ associative, commutative, has an identity element and has no zero-elements.

Below is a partly filled in table for a binary operation ($*$) on the set $M=\{a,b,c,d\}$. I am trying to fill in the rest such that the magma $(M,*)$ becomes associative, commutative, has an identity ...
NoName123's user avatar
  • 417
1 vote
1 answer
408 views

What is the identity element of 4

If $*$ is a binary operation taking the greater of two distinct numbers, construct a table for the operation on the set $S=\{1,2,3,4,5\}$. What is the identity element of 4? Is the operation ...
Sefiuoyedeji's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
258 views

All magmas of order n (specifically 3)

I am considering the collection of all magmas (sets with binary operations) of order 3. Since we just need a binary operation and no other properties, it makes sense to define a magma in terms of all ...
RothX's user avatar
  • 1,681
0 votes
1 answer
88 views

Uniqueness of two side zeroes of binary operation

I came across the following fact in group theory: Two-sided identity of binary operation is unique. Does the similar statement for two sided zero also holds? : Two-sided zero of binary ...
RajS's user avatar
  • 1,317
4 votes
1 answer
349 views

Is there a name for an algebraic structure with only "addition" and "truncated subtraction"?

Given a set $S$ with An associative binary "addition" operation $+$ with corresponding neutral element $0$ such that $(S, +)$ is a monoid A non-associative binary "truncated subtraction" operation $-$...
Kazark's user avatar
  • 1,145
5 votes
3 answers
199 views

Terminology: Semigroups, only their "binary operations" aren't closed.

Motivation: Consider $\mathcal{X}=(X, +)$, where $X=\{-1, 0, 1\}$ and $+$ is standard addition. Then $\mathcal{X}$ is associative (where defined) but not closed. NB: There is an identity element in $X$...
Shaun's user avatar
  • 45.8k
8 votes
2 answers
232 views

Structures with $x*(y*z) = y*(x*z)$

In reading http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=182143561104878BDABB72258DA254D0?doi=10.1.1.18.2521&rep=rep1&type=pdf , they mentioned an interesting relation -- they had a ...
Alex Meiburg's user avatar
  • 2,503
0 votes
1 answer
198 views

Group Theory For an algebraic system, how to prove the following?

I'm trying to prove the below equation (From Elements of discrete mathematics, second edition by C. L. Liu Question 11.13) Let $(A, +)$ be an algebraic system such that for all $a, b$ in $A$ we ...
Mayur's user avatar
  • 11
2 votes
1 answer
142 views

Sufficient condition for a magma to be a topological magma

Let $(B,\ast)$ be a magma (that is, $\ast:B\times B\to B$ is a binary operation on $B$), and let $\tau$ be a topology on $B$. If $X$ is any set and we define $\tilde\ast$ in the set $B^X$ of functions ...
Matemáticos Chibchas's user avatar

15 30 50 per page