Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
144 views

No minors isomorphic to $U_{0,1}$ and $U_{1,2}.$

I am trying to find all the matroids having no minors isomorphic to $U_{0,1}$ and $U_{1,2}.$ I know that the matroid $U_{0,n}$ is a matroid of rank zero with n edges and so it is just a vertex with n ...
Hope's user avatar
  • 95
0 votes
1 answer
95 views

Determining all self-dual uniform matroids.

I want to determine all self-dual uniform matroids; I know that the dual of a uniform matroid $U_{r,n}$ is $U_{n - r,n}$ by Example $2.1.4$ in James Oxley, second edition, "Matroid Theory". ...
Intuition's user avatar
  • 3,139
0 votes
1 answer
52 views

The relation between contraction and deletion in a matroid.

Here is the relation I have seen a lot in the books, but I am not sure why it is always true: If $T \subseteq E(M)$ then $$M \setminus T = (M^* / T)^* \quad\quad (*)$$ I know that contraction is ...
Intuition's user avatar
  • 3,139
0 votes
1 answer
108 views

The relation between the closure and the contraction of a matroid M.

Here is the relation I am trying to justify: $cl_{ M/T}(X) = cl_M(X \cup T) - T$ for all $X \subseteq E - T.$ Why this relation true? Any proof will be greatly appreciated! **Here are all what I know ...
Intuition's user avatar
  • 3,139
5 votes
1 answer
91 views

Are there interesting combinatorial proofs which use more sophisticated grouping than sign-reversing involutions?

There are many combinatorial proofs which establish interesting identities by designing suitable "sign-reversing involutions" on a set of relevant signed objects. For example, Benjamin and ...
Naysh's user avatar
  • 729
9 votes
1 answer
542 views

Let $B\subset A = \{1,2,3,...,99,100\}$ and $|B|= 48$. Prove that exist $x,y\in B$, $x\ne y$ such that $11\mid x+y$.

Let $B\subset A = \{1,2,3,...,99,100\}$ and $|B|= 48$. Prove that exist $x,y\in B$, $x\ne y$ such that $11\mid x+y$. Proof: Let $P_0:= \{11,22,...,99\}$ and for $i= 1,2,...49$ and $11\nmid i$ make ...
nonuser's user avatar
  • 90.7k
0 votes
1 answer
1k views

Computing a rook polynomial

I have this $3\times 3$ square above, where the $5$ white squares form a board $B$, and I am trying to calculating the rook polynomial of $B$, using the following formula : the answer is given as $...
mq1998's user avatar
  • 327
22 votes
3 answers
735 views

A conference uses $4$ main languages. Prove that there is a language that at least $\dfrac{3}{5}$ of the delegates know.

A conference uses $4$ main languages. Any two delegates always have a common language that they both know. Prove that there is a language that at least $\dfrac{3}{5}$ of the delegates know. Source: ...
nonuser's user avatar
  • 90.7k
3 votes
1 answer
184 views

To show two formal power series equal

I am wondering whether the following two formal power series are equal: $A(x)=\Pi_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{1-x^{2k-1}}$, $B(x)=\Pi_{k=1}^{\infty}(1+x^k)$.
luw's user avatar
  • 454
0 votes
1 answer
275 views

Calculating the Most Reduced Sets in a Set of Sets

I'm having trouble solving this problem efficiently: Let's say we have the following sets {1, 2, 3} {1, 2} {2, 3} {1} We want to eliminate those sets which are ...
robert's user avatar
  • 103
1 vote
1 answer
767 views

Proof that Paley Graphs are strongly regular with parameters $(p,\frac{p-1}{2},\frac{p-5}{4},\frac{p-1}{4})$

A Paley graph is strongly regular with parameters $(p,\frac{p-1}{2},\frac{p-5}{4},\frac{p-1}{4})$. I need to prove that, and obtain the parameters too. Proving it is regular valency $\frac{p-1}{2}$ is ...
vounoo's user avatar
  • 421
2 votes
0 answers
64 views

Orbital dimension of the action of $S_n$ on 2-subsets

I have a question on a proof in a paper on the orbital dimension of a permutation group. Let $G \le S^\Omega$ be a permutation group. A base for $G$ is a subset $\Sigma \subseteq \Omega$ for which ...
Ashwin Ganesan's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
8k views

Use of rook polynomials

Use rook polynomials to count the number of permutations of $(1,2,3,4)$ in which $1$ is not in the second position, $2$ is not in the fourth position, and $3$ is not in the first or fourth position. ...
user180588's user avatar