8
$\begingroup$

I can't solve this problem; it may be easy though.

Is the number $2^{1093} -2$ a multiple of $1093^2$?

I do appreciate any kind of help.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ You may be interested in the following article on Wieferich primes. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2012 at 7:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ An efficient "by hand" computation that shows that $1093^2$ divides $2^{1092}-1$ can be found in Hardy and Wright's Theory of Numbers, fifth edition, probably other editions too. Nowadays it it can be done by a more brute force calculation. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2012 at 7:43
  • $\begingroup$ @AndréNicolas I was curious as to the manual computation. Did you use logarithm? Solving for N as the multiple number I get final solution: $\frac{(2^{1093})-2}{(33^{2}+2^{2})}$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2012 at 7:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Mahmud: For number-theoretic properties of large powers, ordinary logarithms are not useful. For brute force I would use binary method of exponentiation. Hardy/Wright have a cleverer way. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2012 at 15:03
  • $\begingroup$ I have an nice proof for $1993^2 \mid 1994^{1993} - 1$, so if you can prove that $2^{1092} \equiv 1994^{1993} \pmod{1993^2}$ you can solve the problem easily $\endgroup$
    – Stefan4024
    Commented Mar 2, 2015 at 20:37

5 Answers 5

10
$\begingroup$

You can work this sort of thing out for number of the form $2^{2^n}$ by squaring the previous result and taking this modulo $1093^2$

   n    2^n mod 1194649
   1    2
   2    4
   4    16
   8    256
  16    65536
  32    204141
  64    606814

etcetera,

and then noting that $2^{1093}=2^{1024}2^{64}2^{4}2^{1}$. And yes, it is true.

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Below I explain the unmotivated hand calculation in Hardy and Wright (appended below).

If $\rm\ {\hat c} =\: c^{-1}\pmod{p}\ $ is "simpler" than $\rm\:c,\:$ then to verify $\rm\ c^n \equiv\: d\ $ it may be simpler to use $\rm\: {\hat c}^n.$

Notice $\rm\ c\ {\hat c}\ \equiv\ 1 + a\ p\ \Rightarrow\ c^n\ {\hat c}^n\ \equiv\ 1 + n\ a\ p\pmod{p^2}\quad $ by the Binomial Theorem.

Therefore $\rm\ \ \ c^n\ \equiv\ d\ \iff\ d\ {\hat c}^n\ \equiv\ 1 + n\ a\ p\pmod{p^2}\quad\ (\Leftarrow\:\: $ by cancel $\rm\ {\hat c}^n $ from this & above)

E.g. $\rm\ \ c\ {\hat c}\ \equiv\ 2^{26}\ (-9)\ \equiv\ 1 + 469\ p\pmod{p^2},\ \ p = 1093, \ $ by equations $\:\#3,4,5\:$ in $\rm\:H\&W\:.$

so $\rm\: (2^{26})^7\: \equiv\: {-}1\ \iff\: {-}(-9)^7\ \equiv\ 1\ +\ 7\cdot 469\ p\pmod{p^2}$

In equation $\rm\: \#6,\ \ H\&W\:$ calculate $\rm\ \ 1\ +\ 7\cdot 469\ p\ \equiv\ 1+4\ p$

In equation $\rm\: \#2,\ \ H\&W\:$ calculate $\rm\: -(-9)^7 \equiv\ 3^{14} \equiv\ 1 + 4\ p\quad$

Thus $\rm\: 2^{182}\: \equiv\: -1\ \Rightarrow\ 2^{1092}\: =\ (2^{182})^6\: \equiv\ (-1)^6\: \equiv 1\pmod{p^2}\quad $ QED

In terms of Hensel / Newton's lemma, we lift a "simple" inverse $\rm\ (mod\ p)\ \ to\ \ (mod\ p^2)\:.$ enter image description here

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Yes. According the Wikipedia article linked by André Nicolas, 1093 is one of only two known primes $p$ for which $p^2$ divides $2^{p}-2$.

The other known prime is 3511. It is known from computer searches that if any other so-called "Wieferich primes" exist, they must exceed $6.7×10^{15}$.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

(Note: This answer essentially duplicates the one given by Bill Dubuque. This is due to the merger of a question asked Mar 2 '15 with a duplicate from Jan 9 '12.)

In a 1983 paper in The Mathematical Intelligencer titled simply "1093," Paolo Ribenboim gives the following proof, with credit to Landau:

Let $p=1093$.

$$3^7=2187=2p+1$$ so squaring

$$3^{14}\equiv4p+1\pmod {p^2}\qquad(*)$$ On the other hand, $$2^{14}=16384=15p-11$$ so $$2^{28}\equiv-330p+121\pmod{p^2}$$ hence $$3^2\times2^{28}\equiv-1876p-4\pmod{p^2}$$ and dividing by $4$ $$3^2\times2^{26}\equiv-469p-1\pmod{p^2}$$ Raising now to the $7^\text{th}$ power:

$$3^{14}\times2^{182}\equiv-4p-1\pmod{p^2}$$

and taking $(*)$ into account

$$2^{182}\equiv-1\pmod{p^2}$$

Finally, raising to the $6^\text{th}$ power,

$$2^{1092}\equiv1\pmod{p^2}$$

One point I found necessary to think about is $$(1+469p)^7\equiv1+7\cdot469p=1+3283p\equiv1+4p\pmod {p^2}$$ Aside from that, everything is straightforward calculation with small numbers. How Landau came up with this approach is the real marvel here.

It's perhaps worth noting that this proof does not rely on $1093$ being prime. It only uses the fact that it's not divisible by either $2$ or $3$ (in the steps where you divide by $4$ and cancel the $3^{14}$.)

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Pretty nice. Not the general method I had guessed would exist, but more clever than my brute-force approach. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 3, 2015 at 17:17
2
$\begingroup$

This is tractable by hand by brute force: You repeatedly square numbers starting from 2, and take remainers mod $1093^2 = 1194649$ until you come to $$ 2^{1024} \equiv 917050 \mod 1194649$$ then you multiply that by your (remembered) residues of $2^{64}$ and $2^4$ and you find that $ 2^{1092} = 917050 \cdot 606814 \cdot 65536 = 1 \mod 1194649$.

So, $$ 2^{1092} -1 = k\cdot (1093)^2 \Longrightarrow (1093)^2 |2^{1092} -1$$

But that is not the way you should do this problem in a number theory course. The question becomes ($1093$ being prime) , when does $$ p^2 \mid a^q - 1 $$

I'm not sure how to answer that easily, but I strongly suspect there is an easy way.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Also by computer. In Maple, it took 0.008 seconds to verify by brute computation. $\endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Commented Mar 2, 2015 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ For the last remark: cases $a>p$ can be generated to arbitrary powers of $p$; but the cases $a<p$ are difficult and for this there is no easy way (known). An easy example however is $p=11,a=3$ making $11^2|3^5-1$ . Look at "fermat-quotients"; there are tables for everal "brute-force" results online available. Theres also one example known where $p^3 | a^{p-1}-1 $: $113^3 | 68^{112}-1 $ $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 2, 2015 at 22:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .