67
$\begingroup$

Can we prove that every entire one-to-one function is linear?

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard_theorem (which is overkill if this is homework or something) $\endgroup$
    – yoyo
    Commented Mar 29, 2011 at 17:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Maybe you can use the Weierstrass Factorization Theorem? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 29, 2011 at 17:06
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ By 1-1, do you mean injective or bijective? $\endgroup$
    – lhf
    Commented Mar 29, 2011 at 17:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Arturo: you should let OPs do some of the fixing! It is a very instructive activity :) $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 29, 2011 at 19:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Mariano: But it bugs me so... $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 29, 2011 at 20:40

8 Answers 8

67
$\begingroup$

You can rule out polynomials of degree greater than $1$, because the derivative of such a polynomial will have a zero by the fundamental theorem of algebra, and a holomorphic function is $(n+1)$-to-$1$ near a zero of its derivative of order $n$.

To finish, you need to rule out entire functions that are not polynomials. If $f$ is such a function, then $f(1/z)$ has an essential singularity at $z=0$. To see that this implies that $f$ is not one-to-one, you could apply Picard's theorem as yoyo indicates. Or you could proceed as follows. By Casorati-Weierstrass, $f(\{z:|z|>n\})$ is dense in $\mathbb{C}$ for each positive integer $n$. By the open mapping theorem, the set is open. By Baire's theorem, $D=\bigcap_n f(\{z:|z|>n\})$ is dense in $\mathbb{C}$. In particular, $D$ is not empty, and every element of $D$ has infinitely many preimage points under $f$.


I just realized that there is an easier way to apply Casorati-Weierstrass, with no need for Baire. If $f$ is entire and not a polynomial, then $f(\{z:|z|<1\})$ is open, and $f(\{z:|z|>1\})$ is dense. Therefore these sets have nonempty intersection. Every element of the intersection has at least $2$ preimage points.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Nice application of Baire. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Mykie
    Commented Mar 29, 2011 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ Outside the unit disk is not a neighborhood of zero, so how can we apply Casorati-Weierstrass to conclude that the image of f is dense? @MichaelHardy $\endgroup$
    – Tim
    Commented Jun 22, 2023 at 18:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @John: If $f$ is not a polynomial then $g(z)=f(1/z)$ has an essential singularity at $0$, and Casorati-Weierstrass implies $g(\{z:0<|z|<1\})$ is dense, i.e. that $f(\{z:|z|>1\})$ is dense. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 7, 2023 at 3:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, now I got it. Also, I knew this was your answer but since I learned that it is an old post and your last seen was about a month ago or so, not quite sure, I mentioned Michael. @JonasMeyer $\endgroup$
    – Tim
    Commented Jul 7, 2023 at 5:18
27
$\begingroup$

By shifting $z$, without loss of generality you can assume $f(0) = 0$. By the open mapping theorem, $f(z)$ maps some open set $U$ containing $0$ to another one, call it $V$. Since $f(z)$ is to be one-to-one, $f(z)$ can't map any $z$ outside of $U$ to $V$. Thus ${1 \over f(z)}$ is bounded outside of $U$. Therefore ${z \over f(z)}$ is an entire function that grows no faster than linearly: $|{z \over f(z)}| < A|z| + B$ for some $A$ and $B$.

It's easy from here to show that $g(z) = {z \over f(z)}$ is linear; for any $z_0$ ${g(z) - g(z_0) \over z - z_0}$ must be bounded and therefore is a constant by Liouville's theorem. So ${z \over f(z)} = c_1z + c_2$ for some $c_1$ and $c_2$. Hence $f(z) = {z\over c_1z + c_2}$. Since $f(z)$ has no poles and is nonconstant, $c_1$ must be zero and $c_2$ nonzero. We conclude that $f(z) = {1 \over c_2} z$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Why f(z) has simple zero at z=0? $\endgroup$
    – nicksohn
    Commented Dec 30, 2015 at 10:33
  • $\begingroup$ Nice proof. In the beginning, you say wlog wma $f(z)=0$. Maybe you mean $f(0)=0$? $\endgroup$
    – perlman
    Commented Oct 12, 2017 at 5:55
  • $\begingroup$ @nicksohn That follows from $f(z)$ being one to one $\endgroup$
    – Zarrax
    Commented Oct 12, 2017 at 17:40
  • $\begingroup$ @MathewJames yes, thanks, corrected it. $\endgroup$
    – Zarrax
    Commented Oct 12, 2017 at 17:40
13
$\begingroup$

Let $f:\mathbb C\to\mathbb C$ entire and injective. Let $U=f(\mathbb C)$. $U$ is an open subset of the plane.

$U$ is simply connected: indeed, to check this it is enough to show that the integral of every analytic function on $U$ along every closed curved in $U$ is zero, and you can do this by "changing variables using $f$".

Next, if $U\subsetneq\mathbb C$, from Riemann's theorem we know that there is an biholomorphic map $U\to D$, with $D$ the unit disc. Composing with $f$, we get a biholomorphic map $\mathbb C\to D$, and this is impossible. We see then that $f$ is in fact bijective and, in fact, an homeomorphism. Composing with a translation, we can assume that $f(0)=0$.

Using this, one can see that the function $1/f(z)$ is bounded at $\infty$ and has a simple pole at $0$, so $g(z)=z/f(z)$ is entire and bounded by a function of the form $cz$ for some constant $c$. Using Cauchy's estimates for the Taylor coefficients of $g$, we see that $g$ is a polynomial of very low degree. Translating this to information about $f$, we can conclude what we want.

(This avoids Picard but uses Riemann... :( )

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ How do we know that the pole at 0 is of order 1, from the fact that f(0)=0? What if 0 was zero of order n>1 for f(z)...thanks, @Mariano Suárez-Alvarez. $\endgroup$
    – User001
    Commented Dec 18, 2014 at 6:18
13
$\begingroup$

I'll give the "usual" proof.

Note that by Little Picard, $f$ misses at most one point; but it is a homeomorphism onto its image, and the plane minus a point is not simply connected. Thus $f$ is onto $\mathbb{C}$, and hence bijective. Then $f$ has a holomorphic inverse, which is enough to imply $f$ is proper, that is, the pre-image of a compact set is compact. This in turn implies $$ \lim_{z\rightarrow\infty} f(z)=\infty,$$ and thus if we define $f(\infty)=\infty$, $f$ becomes a Möbius transformation of the Riemann sphere. So $f$ has the form $f(z) = \frac{az+b}{cz+d},$ and it is easy to see that if $f$ is entire on $\mathbb{C}$, then $c=0$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I should also add that I believe there is a proof using just Little Picard and the Cauchy-Riemann equations. I just forget all the details :-). Basically you show $f$ is a Euclidean similarity on $\mathbb{R}^2$, so it has the form $kAz+b$, where $A$ is $2\times2$ orthogonal. Since $f$ is holomorphic, $A\in SO(2)$. Using the well known form of such matrices, you then show $A$ is rotation by some angle $\theta$, so $f(z)=ke^{i\theta}z+b$. $\endgroup$
    – user641
    Commented Mar 29, 2011 at 20:36
  • $\begingroup$ Why is it that $c=0$ if $f$ is entire? $\endgroup$
    – user225477
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Zermelo's_Choice, I think otherwise $f$ would have a pole at the point $z$ such that $cz+d=0$. $\endgroup$
    – user135520
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 16:43
8
$\begingroup$

This proof uses only the Open Mapping Theorem and Cauchy's Estimates.

Suppose $f$ is entire and injective. Consider the injective entire function $$\widetilde{f} \colon z \mapsto f(z) - f(0).$$ We see that $\widetilde{f}(0) = 0$. Let $r > 0$, and consider the ball $B(0,r)$ of radius $r$ centered at the origin. By the Open Mapping Theorem, $\widetilde{f}(B(0,r))$ is an open set containing the origin. By openness, there is some $\epsilon > 0$ such that $B(0,\epsilon) \subset \widetilde{f}(B(0,r))$. Since $\widetilde{f}$ is injective, no point of $B(0,r)^c$ may be sent to any point of $B(0,\epsilon)$. In other words, $$|z| \geq r \Rightarrow |\widetilde{f}(z)| \geq \epsilon.$$ Now $\widetilde{f}$ has a zero at the origin, so let's say this zero has order $k \geq 1$. This means there is some entire function $g \colon \Bbb C \rightarrow \Bbb C$ such that $g(0) \neq 0$ and $$\widetilde{f}(z) = z^k g(z) \ \forall \ z \in \Bbb C.$$ Since $\widetilde{f}$ is injective, $\widetilde{f}$ has no other zeroes apart from its zero at the origin. So $g$ has no zeroes. This means the function $F \colon \Bbb C \rightarrow \Bbb C$ defined by $$F(z) = \frac{1}{g(z)} \ \forall \ z \in \Bbb C$$ is entire and also has no zeroes. Write the Taylor expansion of $F$ at the origin as $$F(z) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{F^{(n)}(0)}{n!}z^n.$$ Given any $R > r$, we can apply Cauchy's Estimates on the circle of radius $R$ to obtain bounds on the derivatives of $F$ at the origin. Indeed, $$F^{(n)}(0) \leq \max_{|z| = R}|F(z)|\frac{n! }{R^n}.$$ But we can apply the fact that $|\widetilde{f}(z)| \geq \epsilon \ \forall \ |z| \geq r$ to notice that $$\max_{|z| = R} |F(z)| = \max_{|z| = R} \frac{1}{|g(z)|} = \max_{|z| = R} \frac{|z|^k}{|\widetilde{f}(z)|} \leq \frac{R^k}{\epsilon}.$$ So if $n > k$, we have $$F^{(n)}(0) \leq \max_{|z| = R}|F(z)|\frac{n!}{R^n} \leq \frac{R^k n!}{\epsilon R^n} = \frac{n!}{\epsilon R^{n-k}} \xrightarrow{R \to \infty} 0.$$ So we conclude from the Taylor expansion of $F$ that $$F(z) = \sum_{n=0}^k \frac{F^{(n)}(0)}{n!} z^n$$ is a polynomial of degree at most $k$. But as previously noted, $F$ has no zeroes. So $F \equiv c$ for some $c \in\Bbb C \backslash\{ 0\}$! This means $g \equiv c^{-1}$, and furthermore, $$\widetilde{f}(z) = c^{-1}z^k \ \forall \ z \in \Bbb C.$$ Supposing $k \geq 2$, the polynomial $z^k - 1 \in \Bbb C[z]$ has at least two roots $\xi_1, \xi_2 \in \Bbb C$ which are certainly non-zero on account of the fact that $0^k \neq 1$. The multiplicity of the root $\xi_1$ is precisely $1$ because $$\frac{d}{dz}\Big\vert_{z=\xi_1} z^k - 1 = k \xi_1^{k-1} \neq 0.$$ This allows us to conclude that $\xi_1 \neq \xi_2$, and that $$\widetilde{f}(\xi_1) = c^{-1} \xi_1^k = c^{-1} \cdot 1 = c^{-1} \xi_2^k = \widetilde{f}(\xi_2).$$ This result contradicts the fact that $\widetilde{f}$ is injective. So $k=1$, and our final conclusion is that $$f(z) = \widetilde{f}(z) + f(0) = c^{-1} z + f(0) \ \forall \ z \in \Bbb C,$$ where for completeness's sake I recall that $c$ was necessarily non-zero.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Very nice! And you can even add that $c=1/(f(1)-f(0))$. $\endgroup$
    – Unit
    Commented Mar 3, 2016 at 21:15
4
$\begingroup$

Here is a (longer) proof using very little of complex analysis. Assume that $f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic and injective. The function $f$ extends to a holomorphic map of the Riemann sphere to itself, $\mathbb{CP}^1\to\mathbb{CP}^1$. Indeed, choose any $z_0$ such that $f'(z_0)\neq 0$ (if it doesn't exist then $f$ is constant (of course from injectivity we know that actually $f'\neq0$ everywhere)). Then a small neighbourhood $U\ni z_0$ is mapped bijectively to a small neighbourhood $V\ni f(z_0)$. The function $1/(f(z)-f(z_0))$ is therefore bounded in $\mathbb{C}-U$, hence by Riemann removable singularity theorem it extends to a holomorphic function on $\mathbb{CP}^1-U$, therefore $f$ extends to a holomorphic map $\mathbb{CP}^1\to\mathbb{CP}^1$.

As an application of Liouville's theorem, any holomorphic map $F:\mathbb{CP}^1\to\mathbb{CP}^1$ such $F(z)\neq\infty$ for $z\neq\infty$ is a polynomial. If we wish, we can also avoid Liuoville theorem and use some topology. If the order of pole of $f$ at $\infty$ is $>1$ then $f$ is not injective in the neighbourhood of $\infty$. Hence there is $a\in\mathbb{C}$ such that $f-az$ is holomorphic $\mathbb{CP}^1\to\mathbb{C}$, hence it's bounded (being a map from a compact space), hence it's a constant: if $f-az$ is not constant then it is a map $\mathbb{CP}^1\to\mathbb{CP}^1$ which is of positive degree but which is not surjective (as it avoids $\infty$).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Hints:

  1. $f$ entire implies $\infty$ is an isolated singularity.

  2. $f$ injective implies $\infty$ can't be an essential singularity ( use Casorati-Weierstrass theorem and Open mapping theorem).

  3. $\infty$ is removable or pole implies $f$ is a polynomial.

  4. A polynomial is injective iff linear.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Your point 2. is false, $z \rightarrow z$ is injective, and $\infty$ is certainly a pole! $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2023 at 11:02
  • $\begingroup$ Childish error.Fixed ! $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2023 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ I think your point 3. is also false, for instance $\frac{z+1}{z-3}$ has $\infty$ removable, but is certainly not a polynomial. Maybe you want to say, $f$ does not have an essential singularity at $\infty$ or else it would not be injective by Casorati-Weierstrass and the Open mapping theorem. Therefore $f$ extends to a holomorphic map of the Riemann sphere and is thus a rational function. Since it is injective it necessarily has degree one. Since it has no finite poles, it must be linear. $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2023 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ Or you could reorder the last part of my argument, "Since it has no finite poles, it must be a polynomial. Since it is injective, it must be of degree one." (This is probably an easier way to think about it) $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2023 at 11:11
  • $\begingroup$ @porridgemathematics $f$ is an entire function. Let $$f(z) =\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n z^n$$ power series expansion about $0$ . $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2023 at 11:12
0
$\begingroup$

Similar to Open Season's answer, you can take the shifted function to be of some form $f(z)=z^kg(z)$ where $k \geq 1$ is the order of the zero at $z = 0$ and $g$ is a nonzero entire function (if it is zero away from $z = 0$ then $f$ is not injective), and we can get the inequality $\frac{1}{f(z)} \leq \epsilon^{-1}$.

The Cauchy Estimates can be skipped and the Liouville's theorem can be used in place. $g(z)$ is nonzero entire so $\frac{1}{g(z)}$ is nonzero entire. $\frac{1}{g(z)} = \frac{z^k}{f(z)}$ has removable singularities this is extended to an analytic function bounded by $\epsilon^{-1}|z^k|$, so $\frac{1}{g(z)} \leq \epsilon^{-1} |z|^k$ means $\frac{1}{g(z)}$ is a polynomial of at most degree $k$. By the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, a polynomial of degree greater than 1 has a zero, so $\frac{1}{g(z)}$ is constant $c$ (degree 0). So we have $f(z)= Cz^k$. The local map property is used to show that the $z^k$ is $k$ to one in a neighborhood around 0, so $k$ must be equal to 1.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .